TL;DR: Self-Driving Teslas Rear-End Motorcyclists, Killing at Least 5

Brevity is the spirit of wit, and I am just not that witty. This is a long article, here is the gist of it:

  • The NHTSA’s self-driving crash data reveals that Tesla’s self-driving technology is, by far, the most dangerous for motorcyclists, with five fatal crashes that we know of.
  • This issue is unique to Tesla. Other self-driving manufacturers have logged zero motorcycle fatalities with the NHTSA in the same time frame.
  • The crashes are overwhelmingly Teslas rear-ending motorcyclists.

Read our full analysis as we go case-by-case and connect the heavily redacted government data to news reports and police documents.

Oh, and read our thoughts about what this means for the robotaxi launch that is slated for Austin in less than 60 days.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 hours ago

    the cybertruck is sharp enough to cut a deer in half, surely a biker is just as vulnerable.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      As someone who likes the open sky feeling, this is why I drive a convertible instead.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I remember finding a motorcycle community on reddit that called themselves “squids” or “squiddies” or something like that.

          Their whole thing was putting road tyres on dirtbikes and riding urban environments like they were offroad obstacles. You know, ramping things, except on concrete.

          They loved to talk about how dumb & short-lived they were. I couldn’t ever find that group again, so maybe I misremembered the “squid” name, but I wanted to find them again, not to ever try it - fuck that - but because the bikes looked super cool. I just have a thing for gender-bent vehicles.

        • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Bahaha, that one is new to me.

          Back when I worked on an ambulance, we called the no helmet guys organ donors.

          This comment was brought to you by PTSD, and has been redacted in a rare moment of sobriety.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I imagine bicyclists must be effected as well if they’re on the road (as we should be, technically). As somebody who has already been literally inches away from being rear-ended, this makes me never want to bike in the US again.

    Time to go to Netherlands.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      this makes me never want to bike in the US again.

      I live close enough to work for it to be a very reasonable biking distance. But there is no safe route. A high-speed “stroad” with a narrow little bike lane. It would only be a matter of time before some asshole with their face in their phone drifts into me.

      I am deeply resentful of our automobile-centric infrastructure in the U.S. It’s bad for the environment, bad for our wallets, bad for our waistlines, and bad for physical safety.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      human driving cars still target bicyclists on purpose so i don’t know see how teslas could be any worse…

      p.s. painting a couple lines on the side of the road does not make a safe bike lane… they need a physical barrier separating the road from them… like how curbs separate the road from sidewalks…

      • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I mean yeah, I just said above that someone almost killed me. They were probably a human driver. But that’s a “might happen, never know.” If self driving cars are rear-ending people, that’s an inherent artifact of it’s programming, even though it’s not intentionally programmed to do that.

        So it’s like, things were already bad. I already do not feel safe doing any biking anymore. But as self driving cars become more prevalent, that threat upgrades to a kind of defacto, “Oh, these vast stretches of land are places where only cars and trucks are allowed. Everything else is roadkill waiting to happen.”

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      That’s why Tesla’s full self driving is officially still a level 2 cruise control. But of course they promise to jump directly to level 4 soon™.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I already do. Flip a coin: Heads, the car is operating itself and is therefore being operated by a moron. Tails, the owner is driving it manually and therefore it is being operated by a moron.

      Just be sure to carefully watch your six when you’re sitting at a stoplight. I’ve gotten out of the habit of sitting right in the center of the lane, because the odds are getting ever higher that I’ll have to scoot out of the way of some imbecile who’s coming in hot. That’s hard to do when your front tire is 24" away from the license plate of the car in front of you.

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        For me it depends which bike I’m riding. If it’s my 49cc scooter, I’ll sit to the very right side of the lane for a quick escape while watching my mirrors like a hawk. On my XR500, I’ll just filter to the front (legal in Utah).

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I filter to the front on my leg powered bike, most traffic light setups here have a region for bikes at the front of the cars.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    This is news? Fortnine talked about it two years ago.
    TL;DR Tesla removed LIDAR to save a buck and the cameras see two red dots that the 'puter thinks it’s a far away car at night when indeed it’s a close motorcycle.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The argument is that humans can drive with just 2 eyes, so cameras are enough. I disagree with this position, given that the limitations of a camera-only system. But that’s what it is.

      Different sensors excel at different tasks and different conditions, and cameras are not always it.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s helpful to remember that not everyone has seen the same stories you have. If we want something to change, like regulators not allowing dangerous products, then raising public awareness is important. Expressing surprise that not everyone knows about something can be counterproductive.

      Going beyond that, wouldn’t the new information here be the statistics?

      • JordanZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        16 hours ago

        My state allowed motorcycle filtering in 2019 (not the same as California’s lane splitting). They ran a study and found a ton of motorcyclists were being severely injured or killed while getting rear ended sitting at stop lights. Filtering allows them to move to the front of the traffic light while the light is red and traffic is stationary. Many people are super aggravated about it even though most of the world has been doing it basically forever.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        like regulators not allowing dangerous products,

        I include human drivers in the list of dangerous products I don’t want allowed. The question is self driving safer overall (despite possible regressions like this). I don’t want regulators to pick favorites. I want them to find “the truth”

        • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Sure, we’re in agreement as far as that goes. My point was just the commenter above me was indicating it should be common knowledge that Tesla self driving hits motorcycles more than other self driving cars. And whether their comment was about this or some other subject, I think it’s counterproductive to be like “everyone knows that.”

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Why not? It’s got multiple cameras so could judge distances the same way humans do.

        However there have been both hardware and software updates since most of those, so the critical question is how much of a problem is it still? The article had no info or speculation on that

    • Hominine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      There seems to be people/bots down-voting critical takes up and down this very thread. What chumps.

  • sfu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Self driving vehicles should be against the law.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Why? Crash rates for Self-Driving Cars (when adjusted for crash severity) are lower.

      Removing sensors to save costs on self driving vehicles should be illegal

    • Lumbardo@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Shouldn’t be an issue if drivers used it as a more advanced cruise control. Unless there is catastrophic mechanical or override failure, these things will always be the driver’s fault.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Hey guys relax! It’s all part of the learning experience of Tesla FSD.
    Some of you may die, but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make.

    Regards
    Elon Musk
    CEO of Tesla

    • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      +1 for you. However, replace “Regards” with the more appropriate words from the German language. The first with an S, and the second an H. I will not type that shit, fuck Leon and I hope the fucking Nazi owned Tesla factory outside of Berlin closes.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Yes I’m not writing that shit, even in a sarcastic post. Bu I get your drift.
        On the other hand, since you are from Germany, VW group is absolutely killing it on EV recently IMO.
        They totally dominate top 10 EV here in Denmark, with 7 out of 10 top selling models!!
        They are competitively priced, and they are the best combination of quality and range in their price ranges.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Every captcha…can you see the motorcycle? I would be afraid if they wanted all the squares with small babies or maybe just regular folk…can you pick all the hottie’s? Which of these are body parts?