Yes,

Doesn’t stop capitalists from being greedy stupid gits

You won the internet, my friend!

Neat, the article and the study even talks about it

The study calls for a reevaluation of the breadwinner ideology, highlighting the need to understand and support American men’s diverse and often precarious employment experiences.

Hell, the article’s conclusion is about economic instability being a bad thing? >

The economic theory that brought us the post war boom is Keynesian Economics, not Free Market Capitalism

Not to mention, we seen this play out historically in the US.

Inflation didn’t really affect Nixon or Reagan reelection, what mattered was the wars and jobs

When Volkner jacked up rates during Carter, it cause a massive spike in unemployment which is the main reason why Carter lost reelection

I thought this is valuable because we seen Dems picking up seats despite the high inflation and this might provide the reasoning behind it

I think it is hilarious because Elon says he is and this other group is calling him out on it

Elon Musk, while destroying Twitter, is still a massive advocate of abusing employees (https://gizmodo.com/twitter-elon-musk-silicon-valley-tech-layoffs-1850470520) and very much against the strikes (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-says-auto-union-201310505.html)

You are right

It does mandate 2 days out of a pay period, the bill does suck

What is interesting, is while the MAGA wants full RTO and Biden via Executive Order is also trying to push full RTO (just ask the EPA staff). The Senate has this bill pushing for some not full RTO. I don’t support this bill, but I can’t help but wonder if the Senate is admitting some weakness here

Broader context is Biden is trying to force RTO on all federal workers

Which make this bill a shock

This legislation emerges on the heels of efforts by senators like “Family-Friendly” Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) to undo remote work, which makes it easier for workers to start and grow families, guidelines established during the pandemic.

I thought the article was just mocking right wingers

Edit:

It does mock right wingers, and I read the bill it doesn’t look like it has a poison pill besides the potentially harmful twice in a pay period (which is two weeks)

Remote work has been a target of self styled “pro-family” conservatives. For instance, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) voiced worries about federal employees moving to less expensive areas but retaining high pay (The absolute horror!). These arguments contribute to a larger political discourse on the pros and cons of family-friendly remote work.

If it was white supremacist, I wouldn’t share it. The obsession with population decline is weird, but they have gone after Meloni and Musk for being virtues signalers who cares more about culture fights than families. So I guess they can’t be all bad

https://x.com/CACommonGround/status/1710751960381657179?s=20

Common Ground have thoughts on that

“The veto of #AB309 – revenue neutral cost rental social housing on public land which could be built starting next year – while we only commit to study the issue for another 2-3 years is an insult to the millions of housing cost-burdened residents of California.”

OH NO, I have a bias

I am just so bias sharing smaller groups and subscribing to their newsletters and what not, especially as they come up content I like better and provided sources

I will cite the ones that can back what they are reporting and least likely to defend shitty stuff

Considering all other articles about SB 799 is trying to defend Newsom and this one doesn’t, and this one links Sen. Portantino response (one example https://news.yahoo.com/newsom-vetoes-unemployment-bill-strikers-010632833.html)

I know which one I be using

Guess I should unsubscribe Popular Info and The Big Newsletter by the same logic

It is a web site for specifically designed for pushing an agenda

So does Fox News, CNBC, MSNBC, etc etc

Let alone that this site does publish news about Housing, Child Care, Paid Leave etc

Google doesn’t have standards. They only follow whatever makes them a profit

Except they have standards for their news aggregation service

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-get-listed-in-google-news/379701/

checking the About page

“We also to report on current events and news related to population decline while dispute false analysis about what causes population decline”

They still report on news about what they think related to their name

Antitrust news sites report about antitrust

Environment news sites reports on the environment

Etc etc

Like the Financial Post?

Not to mention which standards?

Google News standards?

https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqBwgKMNK8ngwwkdqvAw?ceid=US:en

Honestly, it looks like you can’t find fault in the article information, so you are making a respectability argument so you can attacking the source

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh

Did you even read the article?

It’s blame worsing worker conditions and higher college tuition as part of the reason