• Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I agree that people can’t learn everything about every market. But what people care to learn about and pay attention to counts for something.

    Imagine your friends are trying to decide on a place to eat. You suggest a very healthy restaurant where all the food is listed with ingredients and their source farms. But then someone says, “Eh, I wanna save money. Let’s do Taco Bell.” You explain that that’s an objectively worse decision. That food health is really important. That in the long run, eating unhealthy actually costs more in medical bills. But they decided to go to Taco Bell.

    Putting your foot down and demanding the healthy option might objectively be the “right” choice. But in reality, they’ll just get Taco Bell on their own time and resent you for taking their choice away. People have to be presented with the information and decide for themselves or they’ll just resent the institution enforcing the choice.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      But people’s choice won’t be taken away. Honda will still exist even if they have to abide by stricter privacy laws.

      • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        My analogy makes it clearer to highlight a point. But you’re right that Honda wouldn’t shut down if these regulations are passed. But It could be that the companies they’re partnering with are giving them a cheaper rate on infotainment systems for a cut of the data that’s collected. If we made Honda produce two Civics. One that steals your data and one that is just $200 more expensive, then we fully educate people on why the more expensive version is better. And then they STILL chose the cheap data miner. Then taking that option away with regulation is wrong. I might not agree with consumers here. But the reality is that they might just not agree with us about what’s important. Enforcing a choice because we “know better” isn’t right.

        If the majority of people come together to push a regulation because it’s something we don’t even want to consider when purchasing electronics, then great. I’m just not sure that’s the case. And I think we get into trouble jumping to regulation on every issue because often what people say they want, isn’t really what they want.