dominiquec@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Nvidia is sued by authors over AI use of copyrighted workswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1380arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up1366arrow-down1external-linkNvidia is sued by authors over AI use of copyrighted workswww.reuters.comdominiquec@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square48fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBreakDecks@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 年前That was the entire context of your response. Did you read the comment you were replying to?
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 年前Can I ask you a question? Are you stupid? Because you look stupid. I never said AI should be banned. You made that up.
minus-squareBreakDecks@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前You really came back a day later and left a second angsty reply because I didn’t reply to your first one? lmao
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前You didn’t reply to the first one because you had no answer. You’re still avoiding it. Sad.
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-21 年前No it wasn’t. You should reread my comment. Read. Then come back to me.
That was the entire context of your response. Did you read the comment you were replying to?
Can I ask you a question? Are you stupid? Because you look stupid. I never said AI should be banned. You made that up.
You really came back a day later and left a second angsty reply because I didn’t reply to your first one? lmao
You didn’t reply to the first one because you had no answer. You’re still avoiding it. Sad.
No it wasn’t. You should reread my comment.
Read. Then come back to me.