• uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    BSD boosterism is a meme, I know, but honestly this is the incorrect take.

    Anything as large and complicated as a kernel has bugs. Some of those bugs may be security related. If security is your concern, you want to use the kernel which has people actively publishing those bugs so they can be patched.

    The fact you haven’t seen privilege escalation vulnerabilities in BSD isn’t necessarily because they aren’t there. We don’t know that. What we do know is that not as many people are looking.

    • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact you haven’t seen privilege escalation vulnerabilities in BSD isn’t necessarily because they aren’t there.

      aka ‘absence of proof isn’t proof of absence’.

  • Deathcrow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If system security is the most important criteria above everything else, switch to using BSD.

    nice bait mate.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If system security is the most important criteria above everything else, switch to using BSD.

    Jingoism aside, anyone running enterprise Linux is also not affected.

    So calm down. It’s just the “concept car” versions affected, and your work shouldn’t be calling you for anything.

  • Duży Szef [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Switch to using BSD

    As a person who was using OpenBSD as a main driver for 2 years, yeah it’s got it’s benefits and the like. But I’ll stick to Parabola anyway.