• Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s pretty telling a platform like YouTube really only gets fully enjoyable with an adblocker, sponsorblock and this. I wish PeerTube had a lot of good creators, but last time I checked (years ago, admittedly) it was mostly conspiracy theorists and cryptobros.

      • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem with PeerTube is that there’s no built-in way for creators to get paid. If there are no ads or sponsors, then the only alternative is some kind of value for value system like what Podcasting 2.0 has. Until some kind of well integrated funding system gets built for PeerTube, creators really are not going to be incentivized to publish stuff on the platform.

        • lohrun@fediverse.boo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          At this point I’m down with paying a monthly subscription to a creator for content. I’ve never signed up for any creator’s pattern or anything because how the system is currently set up. I know some creators switched to posting less frequently because their more frequent posting appeared to be hurting their view count due to YouTube’s algorithm. I am so willing to pay a creator directly for them to go back to making more frequent content (and content they actually enjoy and not stuff just for views)

          • lackthought@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            my only issue with this is eventually people will hit a financial limit and only be able to support a few creators, leaving others without funding

            I’m following over 30 youtube channels, even at $1/month per channel that would still be $30/month which is too much for me honestly. not to mention the fact I would have to manage 30 different subscriptions

            I’d like a youtube premium style subscription where I can specify a group of channels and the money gets distributed to them only

            this way my money isn’t going to conspiracy channels, and I would only have a single subscription to manage

            • lohrun@fediverse.boo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Does nebula have enough content to be worth it now? I haven’t heard anyone with a sponsor spot for nebula in a few years now

              • Orphie Baby@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know how much content would be “worth it” to most people. I just subscribed for Lindsay Ellis coming back, since she’s no longer uploading to YouTube due to the “git her b****, it’s her time” cancelling bullshit.

          • Kilamaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you are willing to pay… then why not yt premium ? A cut goes to google, sure, but it goes to creators, based on your watch time, without falling into having to support 1-infinite channels etc. Plus no ads without any tricks

        • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Best I can think of, would be implementing Librepay into PeerTube and make payments easy af.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ooh! Thanks for the tip! Dumb question, Peertube federates, right? Where you can get a feed of all subscribed channels from lots of instances on one instance? With a quick poke around I’m not seeing username@instancsname so I’m slightly thrown off, but I’ve also only been on the fediverse for like a month

          • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            PeerTube is also part of ActiviyPub, so yes it federates.

            I know tilvids.com doesn’t federate directly with anyone, but you can subscribe to any channel on tilvids.com from any other PeerTube instance.

      • 𝜏au@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        adblocker, sponsorblock and this

        I’d even add Unhook (hide Trending, Shorts, Merch, replace “Home Feed” with subscriptions etc.) and Age Restriction Bypass (avoid the need to verify your account with a credit card). I also use Clickbait Remover. It essentially does the same as DeArrow without the crowdsourcing, which is already good enough for me.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Don’t forget the PocketTube extension, which allows you to sort subscriptions into self-made categories. Which is shockingly not a default feature.

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean yes but also it’s not that hard. Google is not trying to give you a great experience, they’re trying to drive clicks to ads.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve used it for exactly three minutes and this is already amazing. I hope it gets integrated into ReVanced and Newpipe.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Kind of. It’s a desktop web front-end to Youtube. I’m not sure whether it blocks in-stream ads (and I’m not turning off Ublock to find out), but it does basically reimplement the Youtube interface without many of its undesired elements.

          • Jase@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Two things. First is that your link doesn’t work. It’s bringing it to a lemmy link and then it crashes because it ‘could not find post’. Remove the lemmy stuff in the front.

            Second is that I fail to see how this website is even remotely better. While YouTube has overdone itself on some features, I don’t understand how removing every feature that has ever existed is any better. The website looks like utter garbage. The fact that it’s not broken up by anything, the fact it has such a simple one color background, and the like 10 pixels border of each video this whole thing just becomes a clusterfuck that’s difficult to look at. My eyes immediately start to glaze over and defocus because what the hell am I supposed to focus on?

            Youtube has some serious issues, almost all of them gained since Google purchased the site, but this is actively worse. It’s just Angelfire Youtube. A clunky chaotic mess that has no idea what it’s trying to do. It claims that it’s to be ‘efficient’ but it actively hurts to read the comments. They’re all the same font and same color. The author is bold but that just adds to the sea of white nonsense.

            Sure. They may have stripped away everything from youtube to make it ‘efficient’ but they also managed to strip away any basic visual design that lets users process information more easily. I’m not talking extra features. I’m talking simple shit like choosing how much space is available for this specific block, what font to use, what color should that font be, the spacing between videos or blocks, etc.

            • 🇦🇺Baku@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, you’re not necessarily wrong, but for some people that is kind of just the appeal. It’s very obviously targetted at a very niche group of people, and if you’re not in that, of course you’ll dislike it

            • rtxn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If you feel so strongly about the matter, feel free to not use it. Or better yet, contribute to the project to bring it up to feature parity.

              As for the link - I guess whatever parses the URLs on Lemmy doesn’t recognise .video as a valid top-level domain. All I wrote was piped.video, everything else was added by the website.

        • Krompus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          More like Newpipe but it actually works (GURU MEDIATION) and has nice UI. I just found it yesterday on FDroid, I recommend it.

    • Kyogen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks, I didn’t know revanced was a thing. I only enjoyed old vanced for briefly in its last days. So good to hear theres still options like this around.

        • Supernovae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Honestly ReVanced is quite a bit more extensible than Vanced and works very reliably. Plus it’s open source and you can download it off GitHub. The manager makes downloading patches about as easy as installing Vanced with the manager a few years ago. I’m sure someone will add a derrow patch to Revanced very soon

          • hypnotoad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve used vanced and revanced since day one and always checked the stickied reddit post for any update notes before upgrading to the latest patch set. Revanced decided to migrate to Discord which is possibly the dumbest place they could have gone to (read: I don’t know how to use it to quickly find relevant patch notes and am angry about it), and I feel like updating to a new version is a crapshoot.

            Do you know of a better place to find out which versions are compatible with the latest APK and where to get support if something breaks?

            • Supernovae@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The Manager does a reasonable job identifying patches available for a given version. The Issues page on GitHub has a lot of the bugs laid out. The Releases tab also has the update notes and the website has the patch notes (including required version).

              On the Discord, #announcements has the major update info. #support acts quite a lot like the old Reddit page where people post issues they’ve run into with threaded replies. I agree having a ReVanced Lemmy page would be better than Discord but Discord Posts are shockingly usable imo. Chat and Off-Topic are obviously horrifically unsearchable chatrooms but also aren’t the only resources on the server.

  • Acid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really good extension, I’ve added it to my browser.

    While some creators like Linus have said they dislike the clickbaity titles and thumbnails but they have to do it due to engagement that’s simply because the younger generations are the ones engaging with that content. As an older person I’d rather just have a to the point description of what I’m going to get.

    • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I might get it for the titles alone. The clickbaity thumbnails don’t really bother me, but I’d like to have a good title at least.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it can be said to conclusively be an age issue. I assure you that many Boomers and older Xers love clickbait titles.

      It’s a more granular demographic than just age.

      • Acid@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe but I can only go with my own anecdotal experience and It tends to be the younger audience more attracted to them.

        Of course, I fully admit I may be completely wrong.

    • Tanoh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a reason clickbait images and titles are used, they work. If they didn’t work, no one would use them.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You must think marketing is made of infallible geniuses. Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.

        • scytale@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They didn’t say it was good, just that it’s what works; that’s why it’s everywhere.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nobody said “good”, but if it keeps existing, it works or at least isn’t harmful. Bit like evolution.

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or there are people with an interest in keeping it that way.

            I don’t think there’s any big conspiracy about YouTube titles, but let’s not pretend thing like wealth inequality still exist because they’re not harmful.

            • Lumidaub@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What “interest” would they have to keep it that way if it wasn’t working?

              Wealth inequality exists because it works for the people who have the power to control it. In a way, it’s not harmful ENOUGH to change evolutionarily.

              • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are you serious? You literally answered your own question with the very next sentence.

                • Lumidaub@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What? The original argument was “Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.”, implying that it (click-bait thumbnails) doesn’t necessarily work. To which I said that the fact that it exists means it works. To which you seemed to object by saying that there may be people who have an interest in it existing - like they want it to exist despite it actually not working. I’m confused about what it is you’re saying.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget that creators will release a video that you might want to watch later and then change the information.

      You’ll see a video you want to check tomorrow but not enough to add it to the “watch later”. But when you check your subscriptions the next day it’s been 12+ hours and they’ve changed the title and thumbnail to further game the algorithm.

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This…if they want to make their thumbnail as pathetic as possible, let them. It’s much easier to spot the junk this way.

  • QubaXR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Love the idea, but just to be the devil’s advocate, I think it will just mask garbage videos. Currently, the clickbait thumbnails and titles are an indicator to blacklist a channel, without having to waste time watching it.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately because of the way Youtube’s algorithm works, even high quality channels are buried if they don’t play the game.

    • ajay@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you look at the DeArrow website and browser extension pages, I made sure to only use high quality channels as examples (Tom Scott, CGP Grey) to demonstrate how far reaching the sensationalism problem is.

      • StandingPad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Tom Scott’s thumbnails aren’t that bad IMO, they’re pretty minimal in comparison to some other channels.

        • ajay@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But they are so much worse than they were 6 months ago. He’s gone and ruined all of the old ones too with arrows and more deceptive titles.

      • LichbaneLB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        CGP Grey is personally painful to me. He used to be a no-nonsense education youtube legend, but in the last few years he’s just maximised clickability - even going thorugh his whole back catalogue and changing titles and thumbnails.

        For example, he made a great video about generative adversarial networks ~5 years ago but now its titled “How machines like ChatGPT learn” - despite coming out before GPT.

        • dack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much every successful YouTube channel edits titles. It’s just part of the algorithm game now. You will often see videos cycle through several different titles shortly after release.

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why though…it only is going to make garbage crap videos look ok and you’ll be just consuming more trash.

    • Hasuris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Smarttube already has something like this. It’s under User interface -> Where to grab card thumbnails. It replaces the thumb nail with a frame from either the beginning, mid or end of the video.

      • dtxer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sadly I can’t find Sponsorblock and BlockTube in the Firefox addon store (Android).

          • Nomadic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            For this ridiculousness alone I quit Firefox. They absolutely do not care about their users. They also have been pushing a lot of shady things, like running experiments and tracking by default. And ff for Android still doesn’t have printing, 5 years after requesting to add it BACK

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Removing clickbait channels, foreign language channels, livestreams, channels I dislike, and whatever Youtube keeps recommending me over and over no matter how many times I hit “not interested”

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Removing clickbait channels, foreign language channels, livestreams, channels I dislike, and whatever Youtube keeps recommending me over and over no matter how many times I hit “not interested”

  • nameisnotimportant@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never thought it could be possible to do that, thank you so much for this and making YouTube a better place.

    If someone knows how to get rid of shorts in the search results I’d be most grateful 👌

    • FloridaUX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If a channel that makes clickbait garbage thumbnails pops up I just click to not have the channel recommended again, and that has worked pretty well.

      Clickbait works and I encourage all YouTubers that I watch to do so. The more people they reach, the more money they earn and the better their content can become. Outside of a minor annoyance to the superusers, using clickbait titles and thumbnails is just good business. Even the very best content producers in their category (Veritasium in educational content, MKBHD for tech reviewing are great examples) use it because they have to: but lots of them dislike doing it. Veritasium has two great videos about it: clickbaiting is a HUGE benefit to any YouTube channel, a good thumbnail alone can account for 20-50% of all views on a video.

      Imagine it like this: every time you pay for anything, you get a free 30% discount if you pinch yourself in the arm. Wouldn’t you always just do it? Who cares about the minor annoyance.

      That’s what it’s like for the content creator. Put 30 minutes of work into a clickbait thumbnail + title and it’s 30% more views on every single video.

      • sorenant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I understand but I don’t have to like it or see it on my stream. I’m sure they won’t miss the fraction of missed views from people like me if they’re making 30% more from others.

      • IMongoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thumbnail and first 5-10 seconds for auto play or preview play or whatever it’s called is super important. I post some videos just for fun and can see the boost when I take effort in those two things.

  • kratoz29@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sounds like a nice addon, sadly most of my YT consumption is done from my Nvidia Shield TV with STN, so I still get those annoying thumbnails I think (I have them in my home screen and that’s where I watch them or add them to the list to watch later within the Shield menu).