@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 days agoCursed wretched marketingmander.xyzimagemessage-square154arrow-up1976arrow-down152
arrow-up1924arrow-down1imageCursed wretched marketingmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 days agomessage-square154
minus-square@xthexderlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 days agoI wasn’t saying everyone was looking at the same image. I’m saying the optical illusion still works when using a single image.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 days agoSure but I never disputed that. I’m saying this effects are real and there was some confusion due to the above.
minus-square@xthexderlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 days agoYou disputed that right here: It’s not accurate to say we were all looking at the same image with the dress. Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-23 days agoI’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?
I wasn’t saying everyone was looking at the same image. I’m saying the optical illusion still works when using a single image.
Sure but I never disputed that. I’m saying this effects are real and there was some confusion due to the above.
You disputed that right here:
Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
I’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?