@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 days agoCursed wretched marketingmander.xyzimagemessage-square154arrow-up1975arrow-down152
arrow-up1923arrow-down1imageCursed wretched marketingmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 days agomessage-square154
minus-square@xthexderlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 days agoYou disputed that right here: It’s not accurate to say we were all looking at the same image with the dress. Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-23 days agoI’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?
You disputed that right here:
Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
I’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?