zout

Regarding 1, in the Netherlands there’s a rather (in)famous family of lawyers named Moszkowicz (different spelling, same name?), which are of Polish-Jewish heritage.

The link is correct, but direct linking is blocked for some reason. If you go to the link from here you will get the article.

We use rince aid for dish washing machines. Works great.

$20? For that money it should be unlimited!

LOL

I take it that you’re not a parent. So, if Snapchat is not able to know that someone is a sex offender, how is a parent to know? All you can do as a parent is talk to your kids about the dangers of these kind of apps. Sure, you could, and maybe should, forbid usage of these apps, but at the end of the day you’re not looking over your kids shoulders 24/7.

My username literally means salt, so…

I should have specified that I mean the x-files type of UFO’s, containing aliens.

At this rate with this mentality, we are going to have photo “evidence” of bigfoot and UFO’s before 2030.

I agree, and it will probably break down anyway giving enough time. But it would be even better to take it out of the environment completely. The best would be not to even produce it for trivial stuff, so it doesn’t get to pollute the environment.

You would have to bury them really deep to prevent them from being converted fully back to CO2, or worse methane, by other organisms.

Certain rocks/minerals will do this. But there is no financial driver today to do it.

From other times something like this came up:

1. The rate of conversion is too low
2. It will only eat plastic if other carbon sources aren’t available
   Probably more, this is from the top of my head. Also, this will still cause the plastic to eventually be converted into CO2 which is released in the atmosphere.

This one. I don’t like the other things you mention. I did join a sub reddit on the topic years ago, but it was awful. Full of people who didn’t know anything of the subject, but were very willing to downvote.

Not for me. Take in consideration that I don’t do a lot of shopping. Two of the maybe four times times I used a self check-out last year;

1. So I go to the self check-out. One of my items is on clearance. I scan it. It shows full price. turns out I needed to scan a different bar-code for the clearance. However, I can’t remove the already scanned bar-code from the list, so now I need to call assistance.
2. My kids drink a lot of coke zero, so when it goes on sale I usually buy a lot of it. In this case, I took all that’s left in the store. I scan one bottle, do a quick count and adjust the number of bottles accordingly. I place the bottle in my cart and realize I’ve counted one too many. I can’t take it off, and now need to call assistance.

Imagine finding a suspect with this method, and not taking their actual finger prints to check if the match is correct.

According to her IG page she posted on the candian forces Reddit about a soldier who removed the condom during intercourse. She was banned for that, and on a totally “unrelated” case threatened to charge her for waring a uniform on her site.

They are also used to cut firewood.

I’d go with hydraulic cilinders. Lot’s of people have died accidently using those, so should work perfect when it’s not an accident.

I was among the last to get drafted (I’m 48). After my year they stopped drafting, but they never cancelled the draft bill.