Content warnings seem to be useless or add stress

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21677026231186625

Can I have some of whatever you’re on?

Nope.

https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llglrd/2019671031/2019671031.pdf

I cannot tell if you are being serious or just having fun with buzzwords

Seriously, fuck off with the AI shit. At best it’s intelligent regex. And “intelligence” here means a specific thing.

This is how it plays out https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/05/what-happens-presidential-candidate-trump-biden-dies

Picture of hot tub [oc]

There. Fixed the title for you.

deleted by creator

Bored toddler.

Slouched forward shoulders, weight on my heels, head back with a pained expression and small crying sounds.

1: I wholeheartedly believe being a whistleblower is a courageous and brave act. Full stop.

2: drawing conclusions as to why these people decided to speak up when they did without hearing it from them is nonsense.

3: assuming and repeating a John Gresham novel from news articles between corporations and their whistleblowers is not only buying into a conspiracy theory, but is also parroting it.

4: partaking in these conspiratorial shenanigans helps no one and isn’t something to be waved away as harmless - otherwise, what’s the difference here and qanon?

If the “bravery” and admiration comes against the idea of assassination, then it completely matters. Idk why you’re hand waving the nonsense here

I’m on your side dude, the response here is kinda nuts.

Well…the first dude did say something about Boeing killing whistleblowers and the bravery of others to step up in defiance of that.

So that whole line of thinking is conspiracy theory stuff with no real proof and it is being parroted here. Granted, usually the assassination stuff is usually tongue in cheek, but the top comment seems a bit crazy.

Same except opposite for me. Communication on the right, info on left