That is an assumption that a physicist would do.
That is an assumption that a physicist would do.
Transportation is not, it’s energy intensive producing it, not transporting it. LNG don’t require much refrigeration normally once liquified.
It takes a lot of energy to vaporise LNG and the tanks are designed so that the boil off equals to what the ships engines need .
Not in the least it’s the most effective means for shipping methane across such distances. LNG remains liquid across the voyage, and any boil off is used for the ship engines that do not typically use diesel.
/s missing
it’s fine :)
Well, I couldn’t care less. I missued the phrase on purpose.
We could care less
Perché no? Un’ po’ come il segreto per come preparare la pasta
it’s Microsoft so probably not unless corporate account. You know the other solution.
It’s a fluid dynamics equation, cannot be analytically solved unless laminar flow assumption is valid.
Naviers stokes equation looks incompressibility fluid. Only possible to solve it for strictly laminar flow.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_equations#Incompressible_flow
Again it’s because businesses make revenue, i.e. Fiat money and people trade that money and exchange it for things etc…
That’s faith in a business not money
Comparison never made much sense, everyone uses money. The same cannot be said for Bitcoin
Approximate Intelligence
Also increases the external surface area and will require more energy to heat and/or cool.
True, there needs to be a crust to begin with and cooked sufficiently to be crunchy at the desired level.
And beginners french!
Why waste Billions? The french invented something more effective!