I see we have moved the goal post to a “technical recession” now.

Ah so the health care system is so bad we have to fight for it now. At this point it is only a matter of time until they make us pay for it. Then it’ll be further enshittified. Things are great 😐

I went to the store a week ago when this was implemented. There were 30% off items everywhere. Presumably people were not buying them and Loblaws had to throw stuff out. They are backing down not because they “listened to feedback” but probably because they are losing money. The greed wins again…

It also tears significantly in my experience, which is pretty unusable…

Some people work part time tho because the companies don’t want to pay benefits…

Yeah. The alternative is to move to a deque instead of a vector (as deque doesnt require move or copy) which works for me as I don’t need random access, only fast insert and iteration.

I should try this with c++20 and how it does in error messages. Right now I’m on 17…

Resolved the issue. Can’t use atomic in a vector as it is non copyable and non movable. Error messages are horrible and led me to a wrong place. The few layers of classes and templates along with the error message threw me off completely.

I’ve noted that if I removed the atomic, this code also compiles and works without problems. So the problem must have gone wrong there somehow, but only when using emplace_back and push_back(std::move)