Is chrome modular enough to make it feasible for Edge and other Chrome based browsers to add support for jpegxl themselves?

South of Sweden

Now I look stupid, but I promise, I’m just too tired to think straight.

Wouldn’t mathematicians also see this as false?

4 = 2 is not correct.

I’ve been using Linux professionally for 15 years. It’s been Debian or Ubuntu almost everywhere I have been. Although that might be regional.

Never walk behind a forklift

If you know how the code does something, you also know what it does.

You are absolutely right. It was inline comments I had in mind.

Absolutely, although I see that as part of why

Why is there a horrible hack here? Because stupid reason…

Comments should explain “why”, the code already explains “what”.

It depends on if it requires server side connection or not.

Sorry for chuckling at your disappointment.

I try to follow Bash strict mode. It can protect you from some foot shooting.

I hate that my government (Sweden) is a driving force behind this.

I understand that you jest, but risk is not only about odds. When you calculate risk you also want to consider the severity of failure not only likelihood. If you risk shitting out your liver you want better odds than if you just risk feeling a bit I’ll for a bit.

Pick a small bug or feature from the backlog and fix it. First iteration of a fix is probably shoehorned in there, then I try to adapt the fix to the code base. Matching the style and design of the code base is more important than my own preferences.

I’m a learn by doing kind of person.

No thanks

Anatsa uses advanced techniques to avoid >detection and gain access to banking >information.

Anyone who knows what those advanced techniques are?

There is probably licensed code in there somewhere. Which means open sourcing it is really cumbersome. It would probably cost more money to open source it than to do the refund.

Advertisements in dreams.