Wait, so you are saying you have either lived continuously on a 29ft boat for 5 years, or only have visited land by dinghy or something while its anchored?

Wild. That’s got to be a nasty looking hull though.

Idk why you are talking about scraping when I said API?

And is all that information in the training contract?

Its just an API, right?

60 million a year for access to the relatively public data… That seems pretty good to me tbh.

Its not a conspiracy… You are obviously not involved in the actual ML/AI, but another sector. You aren’t speaking in any technical explaination.

A lot of us are involved in the technical aspect and understand what is being said by management.

Yeah you definitely went to a marketing thing and got marketed to

I’d imagine figuring out that “more to it” is the big leap that would satisfy the “LLM is not AI” people. Probability plays a lot into our decision making, but there is a lot more going on in our brains than that.

I’m still hoping that Neal Stephenson was right that they are also quantum connectors to every other versions of our brains through dimensions. That’d be cool

I am really convinced there is a Kagi marketing department dedicated to Lemmy. But if it really works that much better for you, that’s great.

But I wouldnt only bank on the logic “the fact that it’s paid, I don’t have to worry about how they are monetizing my data”. A lot of paid services still try to find ways for more money

Are you asking what it means? Large Language Model, if thats what you are asking. Its what people are usually talking about when they talk about AI.

It has no intellegence, but they can be impressive probability machines

Decay?

Its supposedly to learn typing habits. Heres how you turn it off.

https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/microsoft-windows-10-keylogger-enabled-default-heres-disable/

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

South Harmon Institute of Technology though

Old term. Think it was short for “narcotics agent”, used to call someone a snitch basically

Eh I would rather have had a discussion, summary or explanation than read a 400 page book for a random interesting claim

Here’s the book if anyone’s curious

https://www.amazon.com/Three-Felonies-Day-Target-Innocent/dp/1594035229

I couldn’t find any Techdirt articles with substance in the claim, but I’m not going to listen to podcasts so maybe thats where any details of the claim are hidden

That was a fun read with some interesting facts I never knew… But I think you put some weird spins into it.

Like I don’t think Americans are commiting 3 felonies a day, and I’d really be curious about the explanation of that.

And I dont think lying about your age is applicable to the CFAA without some wild lawyering to consider it impersonating someone else to gain unauthorized access to protected data.

But maybe I suck at understanding legal writing

https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-48000-computer-fraud

Thus, embellishing an online dating profile contrary to the terms of service of the dating website; creating fictional accounts on hiring, housing, or rental websites; or using a pseudonym on a social networking site that prohibits them, might all violate a user’s contract with the owner of the protected computer, but the Department will not take the position that a mere contractual violation caused the user’s previous authorization to be automatically withdrawn and that the user was from that point onward acting in violation of the CFAA

I think this is a decent defense of CFAA not worrying about lying about age

That’s a long sentence

deleted by creator