• 0 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle




  • vi is the way it is for very good reasons, I don’t really see that with VS Code. Even gVim has menus. You can have both accessibility and flexibility/speed.

    I would still try to adapt to it, but the PowerShell experience I had a couple months ago put me off it (and VSCodium) for good. Install IDE, install plug-in, hangs forever until you figure out that the useless error message means you need to install some additional .msi from Microsoft. Blergh.


  • kshade@lemmy.worldtoProgramming@programming.devDo you use VS Code?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I agree, thought Atom was kind of a fun text editor but silly for being an entire Chrome browser, then it mutated into this intentionally held back IDE where not even developing PowerShell or C# can be done without mucking about first.

    There is barely any functionality without add-ins but not because they want to keep the base program light. And it siphons all the data it can get, of course.

    It’s pretty clear to me that they don’t want it to be better than Visual Studio proper, so you don’t get a sane menu structure or out of the box functionality. Microsoft made an editor that is somehow more opaque and unintuitive than vi, not because of necessity or for practicality reasons but because it has to be different from the flagship product.

    I’d much rather work with Spyder, Netbeans or Eclipse. Or some Jetbrains product. Or Notepad3 + Terminal and a browser.


  • For real though, containerization isn’t the only way to separate applications from each other but totally fine, it’s the “It works on my machine, so here’s my machine” mentality that doesn’t fill me with confidence. I’ve seen too much barely-working jank in containers that probably only get updated when a new version of the containerized application itself is released.












  • kshade@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzCalculus made easy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Algebraic notation breaks just about every rule programmers are taught about keeping their code human readable. For example:

    • Variable and function names should be descriptive
    • Don’t cram everything into one line
    • Break up large statements
    • Consistency is key
    • Don’t be fancy for fancy’s sake, don’t over-optimize (this is for learning, remember?)
    • Add in-line comments for lines that aren’t easily grasped
    • Be explicit where possible (it’s a convention to omit the multiplication operator when multiplying variables because variables are only one letter anyway…)

    And then we force kids to cram the whole stdlib (or rather its local bastardization) into their heads or at best give them intentionally bad (uncommented) documentation during exams while wondering why so many just don’t seem to get it, even resent it.