I could see some kind of arrangement where the age would be something reasonable like 16-18, but then there is a test you can write (basic civics questions eg. who are the candidates, what does the legislative branch do, etc.) and if you pass that test, kind of like a learner’s permit for driving, you can vote even if you’re under that age, down to a hard cutoff of like 13.

Fun useless fact: you can rearrange the letters of “California” to get “If Carolina”

Username checks out

Rule 5: must be a topic of discussion

This is not a subject of discussion. It’s just OP saying “help me do my job pls”

And also probably some chunk of those views are from bots or otherwise not real trying to boost engagement metrics and game the algorithm

That explains why in the movie Predator, you can hear the crunch of Doritos right before it attacks.

Trial by combat

For like 5 people?

A more accurate and detailed explanation is available by running man hier

Fun fact: you get more accurate info by simply running man hier

It’s entirely possible to use, enjoy, and benefit from Linux while also using proprietary software. Your attitude only hurts the reputation and adoption of Linux by perpetuating the notion that you’re either all-in or else you’re out. Your idea of “Linux the lifestyle” is a fantasy.

In other words, RTFM

I was at a museum with displays like this recently and it was just really sad compared to a lot of the museums I’ve visited. It was so obvious that they were operating on a shoestring budget. It was still interesting to me, but I’m a colossal nerd. It didn’t have the same power to share information with the masses as museums that have actually invested in their experience design.

Silicon Valley (the HBO show) was joking about this a decade ago. “Making the world a better place through highly scalable caching and consensus algorithms”, “I don’t want to live in a world where someone else makes the world a better place better than we do”, etc.

Hey, aren’t you the horse from Horsin’ Around?

I never said it can’t understand it. I am agreeing with the notion that it has a bias against using it.

Those who fail history will be doomed to repeat it

Code names don’t need to be good for marketing, they are just for being able to talk about a thing

Makes sense. AAVE is mostly a spoken thing, LLMs are mostly trained on the corpus of written text on the internet and in books. It’s pretty rare for people to write in an AAVE style in those contexts.

Yeah it’s one thing to say “idk what I saw but maybe it was something”. It’s quite another to say that what he’s saying is the truth and if you don’t believe him then you’re calling him a liar. Sounds like something a liar would say.