It’s an Idaho-exclusive new dish at Taco Bell.
I play guitar, watch USMLR and NHL, occasionally brew beer, enjoy live music and travel, and practice sarcasm.
Mastodon - @[email protected]
Pixelfed - @[email protected]
It’s an Idaho-exclusive new dish at Taco Bell.
On a scale of 1 to balls.
That’s only for a personal domain that you own and can set the DNS records for. But if you wanted to forward your gmail (or yahoo, or outlook, or whatever other provider that offers a public SMTP server) addresses to your proton mailbox, and be able send emails as those gmail addresses from within your proton mailbox, that’s not supported. See here for what the feature looks like in GMail.
I’m honestly a bit surprised that Proton doesn’t seem to have the send as feature. I was able to find at least 15 posts across their uservoice.com site and their Reddit forum, spanning at least 6 years, with one of the uservoice posts having over 300 votes. I just gathered up all the links and sent it into Proton Mail support. Hopefully having all that thrown at them in one big bundle will prompt their project managers to consider it.
I have everything aggregated into Gmail, so I just use web and the mobile app. I’m looking at Proton but it doesn’t have the “send as” feature for external SMTP services the Gmail does.
They meant after Threads enshitifies itself and the users migrate to a proper Fedi platform then we block out Threads.
Congress writes laws, the president signs them. What’s confusing about that?
Nothing. What’s confusing to you about Congress overriding a presidential veto of an unconstitutional law? What’s confusing to you about a president enforcing a constitutional law in an unconstitutional way? Or maybe Congress impeaching and removing a president who refuses to enforce an unconstitutional law. Maybe Texas law enforcement should still be looking up marriage licenses between gay couples, breaking into their private homes (“by mistake, wrong address on the warrant”), and arrest them for sodomy because Lawrence vs Texas was only an advisory ruling? In any legal disagreement between two parties (congress vs the president, the people vs the government) there needs to be a 3rd party to arbitrate. That’s what the court system exists to do. Why should we make some special exception to that for whether or not the laws or actions of our government are within their constitutional restrictions?
Constitutional review is a farce.
If reviewing laws for their adherence to the constitution is a farce, then having a constitution at all is a farce. What would you have us replace it with as the foundation of our legal system?
Look how often they flip flop,
Of course they flip flop, every reasonable person forms an opinion based on the information available at the time, and that can change.
The supreme court is an ideological institution
So is pretty much every human on earth. That’s why we need should have a non-partisan group, to find consensus. Just because the current makeup of that group is overtly partisan doesn’t mean the very notion of courts reviewing laws is automatically evil. We have mechanisms in congress to address it and put in better guardrails for the future.
Constitutional review can end tomorrow with a simple declaration by the president. If we had a young, healthy, 8-1 liberal supreme court, marbury would be overturned by the first republican president.
I’m not going to debate if a president can do that, as my position is that it’s just as naive a position that congress and the president will keep each other’s constitutionality in check as is the Libertarian position that corporations will do what’s morally best in pursuit of profit without government regulations, so I don’t think any president should do that (or even should be able to).
You still haven’t said how you think it will work. I think it’s naive to believe that a legislature would self-correct on a law they had already passed, or for the executive to stop infringing rights by enforcing an unconstitutional law, if the courts could not bindingly rule laws to be unconstitutional. What happens when an advisory-only court says “no this is unconstitutional” and the other two branches just say “fuck off we’re doing it anyway?”
How is that supposed to work that the courts can’t strike down unconstitutional laws? Forget about any specific decisions we disagree with. There has to be a branch of government separate from the authors and the enforcers of the laws that can, with authority, strike down unconstitutional laws. Otherwise the constitutional restrictions on the government are themselves meaningless.
Without an amendment ranked choice has to be done on a state-by-state level. So it needs to start with getting the right candidates into the Democratic primaries for state and local offices, and voter turnout being not garbage in those primaries to actually get them on the ballot.
Download some stuff to your phone/tablet for “offline” viewing. Your work has decided to restrict you from doing non-work stuff on their network and that’s their right.
This feels relevant
.
Sometimes the mods of overlapping communities will discuss merging, usually initiated when one of them notices there is little engagement in their own. But the general consensus in the Lemmy admin/mod population is that having overlapping communities on different instances is a net benefit.
It really depends on what sub(s) you visit. Some subs didn’t have a lot of mobile users to begin with, so they didn’t see much change in their core active members.
The default sort/filter for the front page there is trash now. I typically see the same things hovering there for days.
Generally no. It’s just a straw man the right wing trans phones have cooked up to rage-bait voters. Just like post-birth abortion.
You can still merge the whole upstream branch manually with a local clone, and git will stop on each conflict for you to resolve them. Then when it’s done you can push the merged branch to your fork.
the stupid thing is I still have my children and I adding our MS accounts after creating the local accounts, because I like setting the parental limits once for all the computers. I just can’t stand the stupid email-based usernames it creates when signing into the MS account during account creation.
Cheers!
I started my beehaw and ml accounts on June 2. This one and Lemmy.one are coming up on June 11. And my sdf.org account was on June 30. But this is the one that stuck 😁.
This is why I use virtual credit card numbers for everything online.
We use “my side” and “your side” so it’s always correct from any perspective.
No, of course not. Piracy would sour the cream.