No, it’s correct. You define the operation by it’s properties. It’s not saying that “a plus 0 = a” but “the result of applying the binary operation ‘+’ to any number with 0 should give the original number.”

• is just a symbol. You could instead write it as +(a,0)=a and +(a,S(b))=S(+(a,b)).

You have to have previously defined 1=S(0), 2=S(1), 3=S(2), and so on.

Thanks for your reply!

I hate having to cater to the lowest common denominator, I had to struggle with un-engaging classes all throughout elementary and middle school. I’ve seriously thought about becoming a teacher so I’d like to ask, in your experience, what happens to the children that are able to process more advanced information? Can something be done to keep them engaged and nurture their development too?

Edited an unfortunate typo

The system works perfectly, it just looks wonky in base 10. In base 3 0.333… looks like 0.1, exactly 0.1

Do you know what an irrational number is?

Sure, let’s do it in base 3. 3 in base 3 is 10, and 3^(-1) is 10^(-1), so:

1/3 in base 10 = 1/10 in base 3
0.3… in base 10 = 0.1 in base 3

Multiply by 3 on both sides:

3 × 0.3… in base 10 = 10 × 0.1 in base 3
0.9… in base 10 = 1 in base 3.

But 1 in base 3 is also 1 in base 10, so:

0.9… in base 10 = 1 in base 10

Carbohydrates are the ones with (H20)n

I really like that description! The study of choice. I think that under that lens I’ll be able to appreciate art in a new way. Thanks.

It is unlikely that Mussolini ever made this statement because it contradicts most of the other writing he did on the subject of corporatism and corporations.

From your own link.

But snakes are legless lizards. Link to youtube

Edit: Wrong link, I’ll leave the previous one anyways because it’s also fun https://youtu.be/_5jNZyoSszE

Both of you should look up AdGuard. It’s the only adblocker I use and it works system-wide.

I don’t know if you want a serious answer but here you go: it has to be something done in massive numbers to shift the power balance towards the people and away from the billionaires, else it’s just an individual killing a poor father of three or whatever sob story they’d like to tell that happened to be a CEO

This isn’t entirely true either. The adjective “binario” has to agree with the gender of what’s being talked about, either the grammatical gender of the noun or the natural gender of the person. A salient example could be the noun “piloto”. Just as adjectives inflect for gender so do pronouns, so you can say “el piloto” or “la piloto” depending on the natural gender of the person, and inflect adjectives accordingly. Grammatical gender and natural gender are both distict concepts that impact gender inflection in spanish.

Furigana I believe