Yeah i agree, the phrasing is off.

But it is still interesting that they dont draw conclusions like we thought, and especially interesting that they lie about the process.

In Finland they outlawed private schools. If rich people want to send their kids to good schools, they can invest in the public school system that benefits every student.

So? Its unmanned drones in a war. Why should we care?

There is so much research showing the moral issues of drone strikes, and how creating digital distance from the operator to the targets will easily lead to a higher count of civilian casualties.

I am all for Ukraine using drones to defend themselves against aggressors. But using drones in anything but defensive capabilities, where the civilians aren’t your people, should be highly illegal.

How is this even news? “The guys we are actively bombing managed to hit a single unmanned drone” is not the big story it is made out to be.

You’re completely right, both sides have speech they find unacceptable. But lets try to look at it a little closer, what kind of speech does the left try to ban?

Mostly stuff like racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, stuff that hurts others and keeps them down. But i agree, sometimes they take that too far. I think more left leaning people should focus a lot more on economic equality and workers rights.

What kind of speech does the right want to ban? Mostly stuff about their human rights violations, as far as i can tell.

Two sides of the same coin, i guess.

Squiggles

You can’t just go around accusing people of being mass murderers.

I want that Star Trek future, please!