It’s both.
It’s both.
Databases are just Excel with extra steps
I have HA running as a native service on my home server, which is composed of literal garbage parts from other PCs, and runs many other native services in tandem, including Plex and some VPN gunk. HA has very low system demand, and it only makes sense to use a dedicated system for it if it’s very low-powered and you have no other server in the home.
What you should do is set all of your services up on your new mini PC and use that to host all of your services, allowing you to power down your likely more power-hungry PC.
Audio fucking is an important feature to smoothly integrate notifications alongside media without pausing
No, merging in git does not make branches disappear.
Hey, I do both
Did they never learn the word “lie?” It’s even less effort
In this context, what might it mean for one to “cap?”
Because that’s what the buzzword has come to mean. It’s not Lemmings’ fault, it’s the shitty capitalists pushing this slop.
How is a Mercurial commit tree clearer than a git commit tree?
Not gender, only sexiness
Not covered by my previous comment:
Apparently doctors investigated cataract surgery several years ago, but deemed it too risky.
He can’t smell, either, but he’s been with that tortoise for over thirty years and snubs all the females around.
That seems to be the opposite of useful if a commit is initially pushed to a development branch, which is relatively standard practice; now you’re polluting the tree with data that’s purposefully ephemeral, and even potentially leaking internal information.
Also, I’d argue that such deep details do belong in another tool, rather than asking the source control tool perform triple duty by being a CR and issue tracker as well.
Your claim appears to be that Mercurial binds commits to branches, and I’m explaining how I fail to see the advantage.
It’s only illegal if you’re caught
He shares his space with a number of female tortoises.
He gay.
What an idiot.
Animals in the wild obviously watch movies.
Goth Peep