I somehow missed one of the middle episodes of the first season of House of Cards, and was very surprised at the boldness of having to piece together what had happened between episodes. Very demanding of the viewer.
I did realise my mistake immediately after though.
Crumbly? Flaky? That doesn’t sound like a Danish pickled herring… They’re smooth and fatty, with a light acid.
Danish pickled herring is amazing though… You really think Dutch salted herring beats it?
Honestly just pile up containers in a cave and store the waste there. It’s highly unlikely you’ll run out of storage before winning the game.
Well, nothing increases it, but aren’t there contexts where it is unchanged? Vacuum and single isolated particles don’t increase entropy I suppose.
Local entropy, that is. At a global scale, life increases entropy.
Thank god for fridges
I guess there is some cultural nuance - my impression is that for some people, sexual exclusivity is understood as an impossible virtue which it is important to appear to uphold, but where breaking it is kind of like sneaking a cigarette after having quit.
Which doesn’t make them untrustworthy necessarily, they just have a different understanding of how big of a deal it is.
All together now: there are no paradoxes in quantum mechanics
The units don’t really matter as long as you’re okay with your number of kids coming out with units of square root time over length(?)
TBF imaginary time is a math trick and not something that actually progresses. It lets us apply results from statistical physics to quantum field theory through a Wick rotation.
The Quantum journal is doing a pretty good job.
It’s not a journal though. No editor or peer review process.
I made the attempt, but couldn’t parse that first link.
Fair - it is indeed difficult for non-experts. But all you need to see from it is that it is a concrete example of a (small) actual quantum computer as reported on outside a corporate press release. The focus on error correction comes from the fact that this is the next big hurdle in the way of scaling up. But the machine is there!
This is just one more kind of chip that will be found in computers of the future.
Exactly - this was never meant to replace classical computers, but to do things that are impossible for classical computers to ever do.
Problem is, this only works for systems that have a known answer (like cryptography) with a verifiable result, otherwise the system never knows when the equation is “complete”.
This isn’t quite right. It’s true, there’s never 100% certainty you have the right answer, but 99.99999% is usually good enough. A classical computer also isn’t 100% certain since it’s also technically just a “physics experiment”, but it has an extremely low error rate, like 10^(-20).
when they talk about speed, they aren’t exactly being forthright
Sure, quantum computers aren’t faster than a classical computer for now, and won’t be for a while. But exponential speedup means that the problems we can eventually solve with a quantum computer are literally impossible for a physical computer to ever solve. This part of the corporate hype speak is true. It’s a purely physical fact. Though for sure we aren’t there yet!
it’s… not really useful in power expenditure or financially to do much beyond a large corporation or government breaking encryption.
Indeed, very likely nobody is ever going to be doing personal computing on these, but they were never meant for that, they are meant for supercomputing level calculations.
Do you live under any restrictions due to your job, such as curfew or restrictions on guests? I’ve heard that’s the case for many live-in nannies.
Something else entirely: Do you believe in the existence of an absolute morality? What does it look like, or where does it come from? Do you have some favourite moral principles?
Hell yes! I’d love to share some stuff.
One good example of a quantum computer is the Lukin group neutral atoms work. As the paper discusses, they managed to perform error correction procedures making 48 actual logical qubits and performing operations on them. Still not all that practically useful, but it exists, and is extremely impressive from a physics experiment viewpoint.
There are also plenty of meaningful reports on non-emulated machines from the corporate world. From the big players examples include the Willow chip from Google and Heron from IBM being actual real quantum devices doing actual (albeit basic) operations. Furthermore there are a plethora of smaller companies like OQC and Pasqal with real machines.
On applications, this review is both extensive and sober, outlining the known applications with speedups, costs and drawbacks. Among the most exciting are Fermi-Hubbard model dynamics (condensed matter stuff), which is predicted to have exponential speedup with relatively few resources. These all depend on a relatively narrow selection of tricks, though. Among interesting efforts to fundamentally expand what tricks are available is this work from the Babbush group.
Let me know if that’s not what you were looking for.
Indeed I did. They seem to be pointing to the fact that current machines are not factoring primes in any serious way.
Does this contradict my point?
Prime factorisation is indeed nobody’s primary idea of what a quantum computer will be useful for in practice any time soon, but it cannot be denied that Shor’s algorithm is the first and only method of prime factorisation we have discovered which can finish in realistic time with realistic resources.
And that means that RSA is no longer as safe as it once was, justifying the process of finding alternatives.
Are you reinvesting your joy in becoming more robust to your next bad times?