please correct me if I’m wrong
Okay :)
please correct me if I’m wrong
Okay :)
Me and my wife… Got really bored. The gameplay loop is supppperr trivial, and even though they add in stuff every now and again, eh…
I dunno, it’s okay - but I just don’t get the hype. I wanted to pitch in because if someone is considering buying it I’d really recommend checking a Let’s Play of it before trying it.
It felt like a game specifically designed for a gamer to introduce gaming to their never-gamed-before partner. If you’re both experienced gamers like we are, I wonder whether you’d give up on it too.
TIL thanks.
What’s the difference?
Perhaps I should have said ‘categorically’ instead of ‘definitively’, but they are synonyms so…
IIRC, the only definitive way to ID mushrooms is by making a spore print - and even then you need to know what you’re doing.
Just doesn’t seem worth the risk to me.
The trouble is the upfront capital though, but at the same time another publisher would surely bite at the thought of getting a talented studio’s staff in one go?
By creating way more CO2 in the process to further accelerate a climate disaster?
Your heart is in the right place - just the execution is wrong.
Sometimes my sprouts and cabbage will taste hot/peppery/horseradish-y.
Rich people are truly fucking insane.
But don’t you see how doomerism contributes to the problem?
Evil triumphs when good people do nothing, but there are more good people than evil.
The trouble is, evil is great at rallying evil and demoralising good. That’s why we have to fight back.
Positive change is possible if we work together.
Stop. Please stop. Doomerism compounds the problem, it is not a neutral stance.
Has irreparable damage already been done? Yes.
Will it be worse if we don’t do anything as soon as possible? Yes. And each moment that we don’t do the thing, it gets a little bit worse.
But each moment we do do the thing, it gets a little bit better.
The Earth will relatively be 1.5°, likely 2°C hotter, regardless of what actions are now taken. But 2°C hotter is far, far preferable to 4°C.
Everything we do as individuals and societies matters. I understand it feels daunting, and I’m not really advocating for you to drive less or eat less meat, because ultimately these changes won’t be driven by individuals making the choices.
However, please please please support and push, protest, fight for societal changes for us collectively to drive less, eat less meat, and corporate carbon taxation.
Great explanation (including the pre-edit bit ha) - thank you!
When you say the cypher puzzle wouldn’t be much fun - why not? Surely you could have a set of puzzles through the game that each yield a keyword (seemingly plot relevant, but still pretty random when combined with the others) and the player has to combine all of them via clues in game in the correct order to yield the correct key. That doesn’t sound unfun on the surface?
I apologise as I know next to nothing about how this all works - so ELI5 please:
Based on what you explained here, could the game designed in theory put those 256 bits of key into 256 puzzles - with several hundred more puzzle pieces being red herrings?
But were you making the point the data miner could just then target the thing that accepts those puzzle pieces and reads the key from them?
I learnt that over a decade ago.
Don’t buy a Ubisoft, EA, or frankly any big publisher game.