in my understanding OP was not comparing it to simple wireguard
Computers and the internet gave you freedom. Trusted Computing would take your freedom.
Learn why: https://vimeo.com/5168045
in my understanding OP was not comparing it to simple wireguard
where did you read it that rust obfuscates the code?
you want vmprotect and such for that
It’s up to users to know what they are installing.
Except when all you get is an UAC prompt when clicking the play button, without giving you any information, other than that it wants to execute an exe in a temp dir with a random name.
the kernel level part of that specific thing is preventing process startup after it was killed
antimalware is literally worthless as has been for at least a decade. not even once did I get a spyware (or other) alert for the software of any commercial data harvester company. they are literally bought out and even the blind can see this
afaik duckduckgo knows all of this.
site: limits the site to search on, even shows a warning for that.
“quotes” make sure all results contain the word.
-apple make sure you wont see results where the page contains this word
to simple wireguard? there are wireguard based mesh network solutions out there
businesses are truly developing malware
where I live those run off of a little solar panel. if we’re talking about the same thing, I doubt that it has ALPR function
because they don’t yet circumvent it. but also, are you completely sure everything is blocked? DoT, DoH traffic and such?
that’s a good way to discount any real situation
it seems so. makes so much sense I can’t even comprehend it
it shouldn’t be hard if you run your own I2P router. I think you so this in the tunnel manager menu
as an additional measure, sure. but these blocks are not hard to circumvent, so it’s not enough in itself
that about:config hack is neat, but it would be much betterif firefox supported container tabs like on desktop.
Unfortunately since they moved back to their mercury based internal code forge, it’s become quite difficult to track the state of unimplemented features, so who knows if they even have it in mind
That’s undoubtedly useful, but won’t help with the google part, even if it uninstalls some google apps
GrapheneOS for google pixel phones, otherwise CalyxOS, DivestOS, maybe even IodéOS. All of these are Android but with better defaults, without irremovable spying garbage, and with some features nowhere else available.
if your phone is not supported by these, check LineageOS. or plan your next phone purchase according to the compatibility list of the above. if you’re going for longevity but you don’t need a flagship, Fairphone is agood choice, if you can look away from the lack of a JACK.
google through only the web, what a fucking joke. if you have a google account check your activity history. it will list the times you have opened an app.
if you don’t have a google account but your phone has google services, don’t be afraid that you can’t check it, they’re still harvesting it.
want to avoid it?
Step 0: don’t by samsung. xiaomi neither, they plan to make you unable to execute the next step.
Step 1: unlock your phone. take ownership into your hands. but back up your photos, the 2FA Authenticator app’s data and whatever else is important, because it will get deleted.
Step 2: install a privacy oriented custom ROM.
Step 3: profit
keep bank services contained in the firefox browser. if they don’t allow access there, switch banks, you’ll be better off with a smaller one anyways.
oh. is this optional? on a laptop it’s a good idea, but on my desktop I wouldn’t want it
not the IDE, its the compiler. this is also not some AI shit, in many cases (not all) the compiler can actually figure out how to do this, because it’s not hard, it would just be a lot of boilerplate if written manually.