That’s basically how you’re supposed to do sauna in Finland
That’s basically how you’re supposed to do sauna in Finland
You leave my unit circle alone!
Category theorists 🤝 Topologists
Unable to distinguish 10 donuts from 10 mugs
Also humans: we will breed you until your fruit no longer bears seed, because we decide when and how you reproduce
Someone has then created this portrait of him
For completeness Olivia Vert made it for the Journal of Immaterial Science (also the Barbenheimer one, and some others but I think they only shared those on Reddit)
Matter of fact, I proved that years ago.
Ominous
It leaves out the perspective of the ants, very one-sided
This thread is like a Reddit/Lemmy Smart Guy combo. People who just assume paid researchers didn’t consider this extremely basic thing they learned about in high school, and also hinting at IQ-based eugenics
The lemmy.world thread reminds me of a similar “racism on the fediverse” thread, and the occasional thread about misogyny (dismissive, uninterested and/or personally offended)
To be fair, mathematics also uses single-character variable names
Democratic socialism (DemSoc) is a specific term (not to be confused with SocDem). Unless your point was that DemSoc is a bad term?
I was going to say toki pona is not quite brainfuck but at least somewhere in that direction, with its tiny vocab
I feel like pointing at (subconscious) racism is compatible with Occam’s razor
Not so superior now, huh?
The division operator of a Galois field (I prefer “finite field”, because it’s more descriptive) is nothing like the what computers usually use for unsigned integers. Like, if you’re working mod 5, then 3/2 = 4 (because 2 * 4 = 8 = 3 mod 5).
Gotta love Dirichlet boundary conditions (the function has to have this value), Neumann boundary conditions (the derivative has to have this value) and Cauchy boundary conditions (both).
On the other hand, there’s a bunch of things that are so abstract that it’s difficult to give them a descriptive name, like rings, magmas and weasels
37 = 2187 white triangles. Dumbass.
That blue book better contain exactly 65 normal topological spaces, no more and nothing else