I find risk slightly bigger when you encrypt your private data with the product of the company and store that encrypted data on servers of the same company.
Why: because if they have some backdoor now or plans to introduce it in future, they have all the time in the world to apply that backdoor to your data. Without you knowing it.
That different FOSS client stores your data on their company’s server. It’s an important factor, IMO.
If it was backdoored, many people would be calling that out.
In theory. And not necessarily soon. Don’t forget the context of this thread: we compare bitwarden with keepass, which does not offer to you your password base on their server side.
I have an even better idea: make tool creators and / or CEO of the company, using the tool, liable for all tool’s mistakes and hallucinations.
Which has the same concept as the LLM under the hood, hasn’t it?
They created the client. In theory, they can have some backdoors. And since you store your files on their side, risk is greater, imo
encrypted is the key word
Partially agree: money by itself do not maintain Linux. You need a man - willing and competent one.
We’ll see, whether empty positions would be filled or not.
I imagine the sanctions preventing them from working on Linux is the least of their problems
It’s even more problematic for users of Linux. Less maintainers.
for personal needs
Not effective enough, it seems.
Seems like a rather harmless fetish
C-suites also are someone’s husbands, wives, sons and daughters.
It’s early morning, and Zelda Montes walks briskly through the crisp New York air as they head to Google’s headquarters on Manhattan’s 9th Avenue.
Oh my god, why put in a topic about serious matter all that fancy decorum? I immediately see a man with a bun, typing this topic in a café, not caring a single shit about real people behind the text.
A couple of times. Every time was a disaster.
Well, then you should sue them.
But it doesn’t eliminate the problem, it merely passes it to the media center PC etc
I disagree.
And boy, isn’t that true
Keepass could have backdoors too. The difference is: authors of those backdoors are not from the same company, which I use as cloud storage.