No one can change everything but everyone can change something.

Ach, totally fair.

I use Connect and tag users rather than block them. That way, I can still see stuff that’s posted but I have a hint as to whether or not they are someone with whom I want to interact.

I mean, it probably would’ve been ideal then but as usual, America was recovering from/embroiled in the last Conservative disasters (financial crisis, Afghanistan/Iraq.) And Obama had just burned a lot of political capital giving people healthcare.

All of a sudden or suddenly. Leaning back on old camp counsellor story telling, I think all of a sudden would be better for building tension whereas a quick, staccato **suddenly! **acts like a verbal bang or jump start, if that makes any sense.

Ha, I had the same reaction but the opposite way: the sudden?

Blaming individuals for what is a systemic failure could make them less receptive to change.

Ironically, that’s almost exactly how I feel about trump/conservative voters.

Were I trying to actually change people’s future grammar, I’d totally agree.

But to elaborate on what I said earlier, if someone is going to come flying in from the top rope with some childish/boring “everyone with whom I disagree is a stupid/racist/evil” well, I don’t particularly care about the convo anymore, I’ll tag them as a waste, let myself correct their grammar, respond however and move on, ignoring their comments when I see them in other threads.

I generally don’t correct grammar until I’m already annoyed. But once someone is a silly, well, as the Emperor urged, I give into my anger.

Lemmy has interesting folks like yourself but also a lot of not particularly interesting children.

Wait, making fun of you is being unable to handle criticism but you responding to it is you tolerating criticism?

I’m now a little curious what your rules are.

Global literacy, probably. But I think functional reading/literacy has been falling behind in most Western democracies, especially America.

Possibly! Though really I think it more comes from my general dismay at the dumbing down of culture in general. Every day feels closer to idiocracy and missing you/you’re seems like a symptom.

But maybe I’ll try thinking of the internet as a sea of dyslexics, just in case…

Your history is a confession you have waaaaay too much time on your hands, do you have someone you trust?

Ahaha, that’s a great sentence and a brutal curse! I legit wonder if that would be the end of social media for me.

Or the difficulty in some sort of extension to autocorrect said media on one’s browser?

If that person had said anything interesting, maybe it’d be different. But another “those people don’t believe what I believe and so are evil/stupid” comment, well it’s pretty childish and dull. And rife with poor grammar!

You can’t keep going to this big profits small costs argument without details of how much benefits and burdens is allocated to the parties involved.

You are fundamentally misunderstanding the original quote. Only one person’s benefits (their salary) is being considered. That’s basically the entire point of the quote! And frankly, that does seem to be how most people live (if people really cared about the costs to others, no one would buy sweatshop clothes.)

Also to be upfront about it. I find your grammar thing to be rather annoying so this will be the end of the conversation for me.

To be upfront about it, I find poor grammar annoying and the second hand embarrassment bugs me. Like people misusing exponential to simply mean lots or rapid, without actually being exponential. (If you’d made exponential profits, even a small investment of 1k would mean you’re sitting on a million now.)

*its - it’s is either it is or it has.

Anyhow, if you don’t believe climate change is real then why not celebrate carbon?

And, even for those who do understand/acknowledge climate change, from first order consequences, this isn’t a huge deal for somewhere like Alberta. Yes, bad things will happen but losing almost a quarter of your economy is also a pretty bad thing. (Consider a devastating thing like Jasper… That’s cost about 800 million in insurance claims etc, even multiply that by ten and you still don’t come close to the revenue from a single year of oil/gas (27.5 billion.)

Frankly, thinking through the numbers, there’s a kind of nihilistic correctness to their position. The costs of climate change, for this generation of Albertans, is much less than the revenues from fossil fuels.

*lobbyists.

For the supporters, in Alberta, where almost a quater of gdp is oil and gas, and culturally the pride is in their meat production, you can’t imagine why they don’t want to believe in climate change?

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

The more useful framing might be someone like Ford.

I’d be hard pressed to argue Musk hasn’t had some sort of a hand in a couple significant technological movements (Tesla, SpaceX) but that doesn’t make his political positions worthy of respect.

Similarly, for all his flaws, Ford revolutionized the factory. That didn’t make his Brazilian city work, his shitty anti semetic views right or his “meh” attitudes on ww2 correct.

Musk’s successes don’t particularly quality him on everything.

I had no idea there was a dance, thanks for sharing! Gonna have to practice my booty shakin’!

I think so! There’s a pretty good shop for theatrical makeup so I should be able to get those hauntingly white eyebrows at an almost reasonable price.