Corect, but if the state is or isn’t serving those within, is a decision to be taken by the same individuals. Up to now those who are considering this are a small subset of the citizens which agrregate in underground forums and not actively trying to change the society and have a positive impact.

Housing is necessary for life but it was never a right in that society. Also necessary for life are water, clothing, food, medical assistance, etc. None of them are rights of the people within that society. It may not correct but it is what it is.

It’s called history.

It doesen’t matter that much, corporate ghouls have justified their existance!

Let the corporate whips crack! Let the slaves fall back in line! We want profits!

Because you’re awesome, important to us, we care about your well being. We are a big family after all!

Ohhh no, VLC has some problems with… who’s this Unity fellow again?

Rights are something that the society you live in and contribute to, grants you!

There are no inherent human rights to be had! Even being alive is a happening not a right! You’re born because your parents fucked, there was nothing special about it!

L.E. I see a lot of snowflakes are bothered by what I said, good. Maybe you start thinking once about what you have, instead of whining about what you would like!

That is a unicorn, my friend. In reality we have the EULA, “Terms and Conditions”, 'Community Guidelines" and you name it! All basically are contracts in which you renounce you rights and happily agree to pay for shit on their terms!

Because you rented it and you we’re happy!

It this Onion News? No one can use “american automakers” and “fuel-efficency” in the same phrase!

They 100% do! But the marketing departments always likes to have “solid” arguments at hand.

How else can they organise fairs and conferences where they can lament about how poor the automakers are and how pressure from are pulling prices down so automakers cannot compete… how they have to fire people and move production in poorer countries where people can be treated more like slaves… how profits are so low that they have to use the same jets with the same bitches twice!

Hyoerloop is not a scam just because The con man proposed it with the intent of stopping a high speed rail road project.

It’s a scam also because:

• the idea is not his. It’s 100 years old and has been tackled by other before him.
• it’s impossible to be build from the technical point of view.
• even if you do manage to miraculously built it it won’t be economically feasible.
• in the lasts years it’s starting to be obvious that if it’s backed by Musk it’s a scam in some degree, shape or form. (see also Solar Cities, Tesla, The Loop and the Boring company, etc.)

This is actually very good news for car manufacturers.

Touch crap was cheaper but sold a new tech so => price increase

Buttons are old tech so no new investments or tech development but they are more complicated => price increase

Great range … 😂

Ma’bad didn’t see the obvious. :)

This is one in the series: “When you see it, you’ll shit bricks”. Kind of obvious… thx

PragerU vs trans bitching … choose your punishment …

Just out of curiosity: whathave they removed from your plan?

L.E. I didn’t see the obvious, sorry!

How lazy and dependent people are if they can be “blackmailed” by the food delivery service and that service doesn’t fear a significant loos of customers!

Essentially all the products where the following is true:

(cost of parts + cost of repair work) is comparable to the cost of the new product. (that means ≥ or slightly lower)

All those features you would like are great but hurt the profits so you won’t get them, sorry.

This is the whole point: they cannot expand. While there will always be cheap enough products that don’t make economic sense to repair there will always be goods that can be repaired. The limit is set by a complex economic equilibrium and is always moving but first you have to create that possibility.

Right now there is only limited repair possibility not because it’s not feasible economically or there are no providers or customers for the service but because there is an active struggle from the manufacturers to stop this activity for increased sales and profits.