- 0 Posts
- 694 Comments
fun fact, the RFC introducing NAT calls it a “short-term solution”
2·15 days agowow why is this getting downvotes for admitting a mistake?
2·15 days agoSorry for being a dick but it
Just stop then.
Between people on the internets lack of good grammar and common courtesy, the first one is a far smaller problem in my eyes.
I believe you got that backwards
Cans and glass are infinitely recyclable. Recycling aluminum saves 96% of the energy of producing new.
oh wow thats much better than I thought!
Sadly, recycling isn’t as effective as one might think. For example, only a small subset of the plastic you put in the plastic recycling bin will actually be recycled.
Does this mean you shouldn’t bother? No, but it gives all the more reason to try to use less plastic to begin with.
Did you even read the text you shared? It just says he left mozilla.
nah I think it’s Linus
come on now, let them cook, trust the process
they wrote ass backwards ass backwards. It’s a joke, not self censorship.
Not dietal calories.
The calorie numbers we assign to food, measure how much energy our body extracts from them when eaten.
In this context, plutonium is closer to 0
If we instead want to measure the actual total physical energy content of materia, we would turn to E=mc^2, telling us that a gram of anything has about 20 million kcal, no matter if its plutonium or diet coke. which is a slightly less useful value on food labels :D
This headline… do I smell toast?
“Harvard scientist Rachel Greene”
Everyone’s happy
deleted by creator
It wasn’t better but I kinda miss it.
It’s the gorillast of them all
modern cpus has an energy density on par with nuclear power plant cores.
they need cooling, money cant break physics.