• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 15th, 2023

help-circle











  • I work in IT, there the situation for corpos who want to force RTO is just a nightmare.

    There are a bunch of companies waiting with open arms and better contracts to gather these disgruntled workes with knowledge in the industry. So not only do you loose a lot, your competition grows stronger at the same time.

    On top of that, if you dont need to rent a huge building at high price, massively cutting costs on overhead an maintenance.

    And once the bleeding starts its hard to stop: Others need to pick up more work, get pissed and then also leave for greener pastures.

    All because you are stuck in the past.


  • One of the more honest arguments I have seen about RTO:

    The company has rented an important building for operations.

    That building is prime real-estate, which is now loosing value, because no one is using it and no one wants to buy it.

    Since that can get very expensive, forcing use of the building to keep the investment stable makes sense on paper.

    Result: Workers are forced back into office, to everyones detremend. Just because some guys asset is loosing value and now everyone else has to suffer because of it.


  • This might be unpopular, but here goes nothing:

    With the correct and fitting (and fair) regulations, oversight by the government and accountabilit, this is a correct and more ethical decision.

    Stuff costs money. For now. Infrastructure, wages, repairs, fixes, improvements, new features.

    All these things dont come free and we only pay nothing DIRECTLY, because we pay in data, attention and privacy violations.

    By fixing this issue, the access to all these things can be secured without the plattform falling appart or having to resort to invasive data harvesting. We could even make these practices illegal, because plattforms would not just die then.

    And no, the price should not be so high to generate profit for the executives. Thats why regulation is so important.

    In the Modern Age we live in, Social Media is at this point akin to an essential service and should therefore be regulated as such: No profit, but stable maintenance and secure access free from monetary interest for everyone equally.


  • Purely economically speaking that is true, but that’s not the only relevant thing here.

    Remember it’s the Chinese Government essentially harvesting massive ammounts of data. A price well worth it, if you use it later down the line in propaganda efforts, marketing strategies and “spotting potential dissidents”.

    A more apt punishment would be forcing then to delete the data, prevent future harvesting or massively increase the fine to offset potential political gains.


  • Raise your hand if you are convinced this will not impact the people who pay for the blue checkmark. Meaning that a lot of Elon Fanbois / Bots / Fascists will be seen with theit shitty takes (since the checkmark pushes your comments up), while voices of reason will be dragged down further.

    Twitter is rapidly becomming the new Truth Social and it’s sad to watch.