2·
1 year agoI’m asking in good faith, how would Sanders have done it? He’d have the same Senate and same House.
CapgrasDelusion
- 0 Posts
- 30 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 9th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Who do you think would have done better and how?
Biden’s policy and legislative record as President are far more impressive than anyone expected, and the author of this piece outlines how and why.
No one you’re responding to read it.
You mean the railroad thing where he got them the sick days they wanted after the news cycle stopped paying attention?
The gerrymandered house and the gerry-landed Senate make this impossible. Put whatever candidate you want to replace Biden. The results will be the same or worse.
We can’t even fill basic pentagon positions thanks to “Coach.” But Biden should have unilaterally fixed everything. Sure.
10·1 year agoIf this was a law asking about policies for protecting against piracy it wouldn’t even be a headline. Protect money, fine. Protect humanity, fuck that.
What a bonkers hill to literally die on.
If he wins despite the massive “election interference” he faces, he is fully justified in unleashing the vengeance that is so prominent a part of his 2024 message. If he seems to lose … it’s clearly grounds for whatever extra-constitutional redress he and his supporters choose.
This was all true before she opened her mouth. He’s been laying the foundation for that for 3 years. He continues to, despite his indictments for doing so.
Stop the Steel
They’re not all stupid, but they’re all catering to stupid. With the exception of Chris Christie which is why he’s so far behind.
It’s less that he’s bought and more that he’s hoping to be bought. He’s seeking donations from other people with a vested interest in denying human made climate change. He’s not bought, he’s for sale.
3·1 year agoThat’s certainly quotes around a lot of things I didn’t say. I admit I need to do a better job seeing past my own biases.
I also admit OPs posting pattern is materially irrelevant to the contents of the Washing Post article on its own. I was just pointing out a larger pattern within the c/worldnews community as a whole. In that context someone with an agenda can have influence.
But I’m not sure why I did. They seem like a nice person and post good faith articles. This was probably a misaimed shot on my part, true or not.
I didn’t attack the source. I just pointed out that someone posting more than most on lemmy could push a certain point of view using any and all sources if they cherry pick.
If this is a play on my username, I laughed.
I actually read most of Nightowl’s submissions for the reason you mention, to read outside my “narrative.” But they have an agenda and people should know that.
As far as I can tell, this prolifically posting account has literally never posted an article that wasn’t negative on Ukraine, and posts about 90% negative on the West in general. For whatever that’s worth.
What’s the over under on how many days until he backtracks this wonderful idea? I’ll put it at 5. I choose over but only because I think that’s how long the coke and benzo binge will take to wear off.
I’m not sure there’s anyone who will be able to replace his cult leader personality that fires these people up.
I’m always so baffled as to how. He has the oratorical skills of a third grader in the remedial class.
The more accurate headline is “One Idiot Posts a Letter to The Site Formerly Known as Twitter.”
District court decisions in Texas are not binding in South Carolina. They’re not even binding in their own district.
https://www.law.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Matthew-Schafer-FederalLawFederalCourtsandBindingandPersuasiveAuthority.pdf
Top of page 2: