Also the more the internet is swept with AI generated content, the more future datasets will be trained on old AI output rather than on new human input.

So you just reviewed your own list by writing “Undeniably true” under nearly every bullet point? xD For some reason I find that very funny.

deleted by creator

I finished the game after about 85 hours and yeah… act 2 and 3 need some polish. I ran into more than one gamebreaking bug. But overall it was still a really really great experience and taking the complexity of the game into account I think the overall polish of the game at release was quite good.

A bad take if I’ve ever seen one.

I’d say that Italy is still an outlier and for example in Germany we’re still far far away from a situation like that. There are some early warning signs though and we better collectively get all our shit together.

deleted by creator

And how does this negate my initial point that you shouldn’t trust in the security of something just because it is open source? I think you misunderstood what I was saying.

Dont understand what that has to do with the discussion so far. How is this relevant here?

Regarding point 2. I get what you’re saying but I instantly thought of Heartbleed. Arguably one of the most used examples of open source in the world, but primarily maintained by one single guy and it took 2 years for someone to notice the flaw.

So believing something is „safe“ just because it is open source and „open to billions of people“ can be problematic.