Why not?
[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0
Why not?
However, the hacker(s) indicated, that should Schneider publicly admit to this latest data breach, the ransom would be cut in half. Thus, the ransom demanded would decrease to $62,500 worth of baguettes, we would presume. Even with a 50% deduction, that’s still a lot of dough.
firstly I was joking
secondly, cautious ≠ squeamish. we shouldn’t be setting masculinity as an example
energy is converted and never destroyed so it’s true
WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS TOM SCOTT SLANDER
The very second website in the file they use to track recently-moved websites uses substack (now).
Meanwhile, Automattic’s response to WP Engine’s lawsuit claimed the company “failed to plausibly allege specific financial harm.”
The footer says the site is operated by Automattic.
I’m not saying the system works or rises to the level of good. I’m saying that it is much better than the Russian system. The people at least get to choose who they think they want, and which group of people will be whipped more.
Framework with Fedora, whom they’ve partnered with basically since launch
fair, but i understand the choice as that’s a lot more work to do along with having to adopt some sort of arbitrary inclusion standard
Aren’t a slow update schedule and a closer look to home better for newbies?
…is that all? that it uses XOrg?
that’s called competition
Which PULSE?
Brian Wilson Presents SMiLE if you wanna expand into psychedelia
You might wanna try out Pale Moon. It’s optimized for single-thread performance and takes up a bit less memory.
It sets an absolutely obscene precedent that a government can globally restrict information
Again, the information is still everywhere.
Even global terrible actors like Russia and China haven’t succeeded at that.
Actually, the Chinese Wikipedia used to have a systemic bias in favor of the CPC before China blocked it, after which the bias was changed.
because the entirety of Wikipedia is open source and would be mirrored in the country instantly
It’s a bit elitist to restrict information—weapons of revolution—to those who know how to find a mirror website. Why don’t you survey the Chinese nationals in-person to see if they know how to get on Wikipedia? Plus, to avoid block evasion, no mirrors would be able to edit Wikipedia.
Dude, what bad does this do? To the Indian people, to you? The information has already been plastered all over the internet, including archives of said article, which anyone may access at their will and command. You want billions of Indian peoples to suffer and be deprived of intellectual revolution for what, grinding a utopic axe? Ceasing operations in India would do way more damage to Wikipedia’s goal.
No/Yes/Yes