Feel like I’m destroying the dataset with QWERTY so I’ll wait until QWERTZ is available :)
Feel like I’m destroying the dataset with QWERTY so I’ll wait until QWERTZ is available :)
You sound like you’re really fun and easy to work with.
It needs to be specific to be clear for its purposes. You can express everything in simpler terms but then you risk leaving things out of definitions. It’s basically legal speak.
Normally, you’d read the scope of such a document to see whether it fits your purpose, then cherry-pick the chapters necessary. If something’s unclear, you can google pretty much everything.
Doing that a few times will make it infinitely easier! You especially get to understand those broad, inaccessible definitions a lot easier.
And for the full Linux experience do it at the perfect moment, such as when you’re in a lecture or customer presentation!
Those people are idiots. You always need to check the credentials and history of people telling you something, and even then - if they’re an expert in security they may know nothing about electronics or explosives or how secret agencies operate.
And yes, news can be really unreliable - on purpose or just out of mistakes. Gotta always keep that in mind as well, but it also reeeally depends on the particular media company.
What was the comment? That the source is untrustworthy? Why was it removed?
As a pentester, if I see XML in HTTP I start crying.
Wow I am totally amazed at this and your other pictures. I will definitely be trying this myself! I’m quite new to photography with anything other than a phone and am fascinated by it all. I have a Canon AE-1 and just love the mechanics behind it - your post made my head explode at understanding optics!
If you show me how that’s physically possible I will concede your point, but until then: No, that’s not nearly the same. You can’t just selectively block physical ads.
While the comparison may make sense when not thinking it through, print is a completely different medium than digital where comparisons only make limited sense. In this one they don’t at all.
Physical media does not track views (directly) or click through numbers, for example.
You are just self-important and cannot come to terms with reality, lol. All those creators and their content would not exist in this form, for free, without YouTube. All other platforms are locked behind a paywall.
But geniuses like you then talk down paywalls as well, because how dare they monetize their time?! You just want everything for free - be honest about it.
They talked about it in the WAN show and they do not share that data as of a few months ago.
They talked about it in the WAN show and they do not share that data as of a few months ago.
SponsorBlock does not change anything about the money they get from sponsorships. So no, that does not help them more than otherwise.
You’re really spending a lot of energy calling piracy not piracy.
You’re just justifying your actions. YouTube is not free to run, and the content there is not free to create. You’re a parasite.
Don’t worry, I’m as well - but be honest about it. What you’re doing, and many other gigabrains here, is just pathetic. There is a lot of corporate greed in this world, but this ain’t it.
No, that’s called nuance and honesty.
You completely missed the point.
This was about the elegance of the answer, not the answer itself.
Satoshi Nakamoto is some kind of consipracy…?
Satoshi Nakamoto.
That is not overcompensation, that is risk management 101.