🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agoMake illegally trained LLMs public domain as punishmentwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square140fedilinkarrow-up11.26Karrow-down134file-text
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1external-linkMake illegally trained LLMs public domain as punishmentwww.theregister.com🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square140fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBronzebeard@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·15 hours agoIt wouldn’t be. It would still work. It just wouldn’t be exclusively available to the group that created it-any competitive advantage is lost. But all of this ignores the real issue - you’re not really punishing the use of unauthorized data. Those who owned that data are still harmed by this.
minus-squarestephen01king@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·14 hours agoIt does discourages the use of unauthorised data. If stealing doesn’t give you competitive advantage, it’s not really worth the risk and cost of stealing it in the first place.
minus-squareBronzebeard@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·51 minutes agoIf you can still use it after you stole it, as opposed to not being able to use it at all… Then it does give you an incentive
It wouldn’t be. It would still work. It just wouldn’t be exclusively available to the group that created it-any competitive advantage is lost.
But all of this ignores the real issue - you’re not really punishing the use of unauthorized data. Those who owned that data are still harmed by this.
It does discourages the use of unauthorised data. If stealing doesn’t give you competitive advantage, it’s not really worth the risk and cost of stealing it in the first place.
If you can still use it after you stole it, as opposed to not being able to use it at all… Then it does give you an incentive