• Senal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Moving goalposts again? you’ve already used that twice, le sigh

    “vast majority” and “majority” aren’t the same, i specifically called out the vast part…but you do you.

    yes, finally an lgbt dig i was losing hope at this point but i get it now, you were keeping it in reserve, i can’t wait to see what you do with the immigrants, perhaps even we can hope for some drag queen action?..wait no, don’t tell me, i want it to be a surprise.

    a bit weak after that though

    provable unlikelihood presented as fact x2 , then lie that is easily provable and contradicts your own stance ( and still fundamentally misunderstands the difference between regular and voting population )

    You did get the slogan in though so some extra points for that, weird capitalisation, but close enough.

    hmm, a tough call this one…i’ll give it a 6/10, a couple new bingo entries but repetition and self contradiction are fairly weak.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh i see where my confusion is coming from, you’re the personification of a county.

        That is entirely my bad for thinking you were talking about either voting population or actual population, neither of which has a vast majority of anything.

        You were just talking about how you and your swing state county personification buddies won out by a narrow margin.

        What were there, like 10 of you, 12? i suppose 7 or 8 out of ~12 could be considered a vast change.

        You have defeated me sir (or whatever the pronoun for a county is) , with unassailable logic, facts and a true understanding of statistics and the word “vast”.

        I concede.


        Just realised that if you are struggling with “vast” you might not understand what a personification of something is, if so , disregard all of the above it isn’t going to make any sense.


        Dammit forgot the rating.

        Repeating of a factually incorrect statement, self-proclaimed victory over a position not claimed or proven.

        1/10 - lacks originality, no personal attacks, no strawmen, no fallacies at all as far as i can tell, not even a single slur.

        A single easily provable mis-truth and then a self proclaimed victory over an imaginary battle, what is this amateur hour?

        If a gambit doesn’t land, you switch tactics or double down, come on now, it’s like you aren’t even trying.