• Lurk99777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    And the native Americans weren’t? You’re the one ignoring history or intentionally misunderstanding the analogy.

    • EvilZionistEatingChildren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Case A: population X came to a new land and killed almost all of population Y which lived there before.

      Case B: population X came back to their homeland, got attacked by population Y, won the war, didn’t not kill population Y, regularly tried to establish truce with population Y which continues to refuse the population X’s right to exist.

      • Lurk99777@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Their homeland? It wasn’t their homeland for hundreds of years. The Zionist movement displaced people already living there who had nothing to do with a conflict that occurred hundreds of years prior. They didn’t kill the Palestinians outright but they sure as hell did a good job of systematically stripping them of their rights to exist.

        Their stated goal from the beginning was to invade and establish a religious state where people were already living similar to what Europeans did when they colonized the Americas.