I have now a pixel 8, which was working OK from the past 8 months and using grapheneos. Unfortunately, today out of nowhere got the green screen bug (searched around, this seems to be really a thing with pixel 8 and some pixel 7). This really stroke me a nerve. Previously I had a pixel 5 which at some point also got screen problems and later the speaker piece just straight up did not work properly. And now this with the pixel 8.
So my question is: what other phones could potentially be used with a custom ROM that allow bootloader relocking? Other Roms can be something like divest or calyx (I used calyx before, so I am fairly familiar with it).
It really pisses me off the only option until now are pixel phones for proper relocking (from what I know from a while back), and then they have these annoying issues. It makes my skin crawl, but if required I would change to an iPhone (and throwaway a lot of things that android is actually superior, such as proper tor browser, VPN split tunneling, work/user profiles, no bloody account to use a phone).
Thanks for the responses in advance.
At 8 months old it should be well within warranty. Just get it fixed.
And I will. Still does not mean I will go after something else immediately after warranty is over (or even before if issues happen in difficult times, like traveling).
First, don’t buy new phones. You’re paying a massive premium to be first. Especially since you’re going to flash a rom, which has a little risk anyway (I’ve bricked phones by flashing, though not for years).
I just upgraded from a 2017 flagship to a Pixel 5 (only because my cell company decided to stop it working on their network, when I can throw a different Sim in and it works fine). I was able to buy 3 Pixel 5’s for less than you paid for your new phone. Which means I have a daily driver, a hot spare, and a test device for a little over $400.
If my daily breaks, I pickup my spare and swap the SIM, since I keep both phones synced with Syncthing. I don’t even have to login to anything because that’s all done. (I had 4 functional devices of my 2017 phone, they had become so cheap).
So pick a 1-2 year old model that you like the features, and pay far less for it.
Before (finally) coming to the pixel, I would look at the Lineage device list, then check those phones out at gsmarena.com and phonearena.com to see which I’d prefer, because Lineage has the broadest device support that I’ve seen.
Today I run DivestOS, a fork of Lineage with some changes to a few things. I forget now exactly what I preferred (I’d have to pull up my comparison spreadsheet), but average battery consumption is a staggering 0.5% per hour, with microg services installed and a couple apps using it. Consumption average increases to about 4% per hour when I’m doing a lot of intensive stuff - copying files over the network, using nav, watching a video, etc.
it is usually a good idea to buy the flagship of the last year at summer. I did that and never regretted it
I do understand where you’re coming from. I never buy a phone without a somewhat good discount (which I got on this one). As for the risk flashing, quite frankly the cases of breaking are so far and few in between that for the odds given nowadays, I am OK in doing this on a brand new pixel (for other phones that require unlock first and all that jazz I do not try it on brand new).
As for the lineage os bit: lots of devices, but the lack of unlock for me is a no no. If it was an older device without important stuff such as banking sure, I would totally go for it.
EDIT: where you read unlock I actually meant root. Most phones cannot be unlocked unless you have root
EDIT: where you read unlock I actually meant root. Most phones cannot be unlocked unless you have root
I don’t think this is right.
Unlock related to bootloader. root is different.
Haven’t touched other phones in a while, so there is a chance this is not correct. However, I do remember trying to have my old s10e to have anything else that is not Samsung ROM. Its a nightmare.
Yeah rooting was a thing in mid 2010s, it changed since then. you don’t need to root to flash a room. unlocking bootloader is enough.
samsung went out of their way to fuck over custom rom community.
oneplus did something similar around oneplus 9. i think they were relockable for a bit then oneplus pushed out firmware update to block it or some such thing.
this is how we ended up with pixels as only viable “mass market” choice. I am sure google would shut it down if it was not used as reference model for devs.
watch them close this route for us soon enough.
They are getting annoyed with us but they got ad blocker fight on their hands and anti trust ruling so they got to play coy for now.
For the reasons you mention, I really REALLY hope pinephone goes far and we have something else viable on the long run
As far as I recall, root has never been required to flash a phone.
This is because flashing occurs at the firmware level, while root, again, is a function of the installed OS.
Unlock has nothing at all to do with root.
Root is dependent on unlocking, not the reverse, as root is part of the installed OS.
I just had a purple line appear on my pixel 8, google offered me $490 on trade for a 9. The line is intermittent so I just rated my phone as good condition for the trade in. There is an extended warranty on the problem so if they try and give me any shit about it I’ll just reference that. If you do trade it in, make sure to uncheck the box that says you’ll accept less on the trade if they decide the condition isn’t as described. I have no actual evidence, but given my fairly extensive history dealing with googles customer service I think they may try and screw you over on the trade.
I did hear about the extended warranty because of this issue, but I was completely unaware of the check boxes stuff. Thanks for the heads up! Also… Clearly there are issues and stiil try to pull some shit with dark patterns. Classy
Maybe fairphone is up your alley?
Last time I heard, fairphone did support calyx, but no dice on the relocking. A shame really, since I do believe the people at fairphone are doing quite an important mission on the phone world.
deleted by creator
I did check their page, do not see it there https://grapheneos.org/faq#supported-devices
Is it an unofficial image that works on FP 4 and 5?
Graphene only supports Pixel
The comment is no longer there, but claimed that FP did have a graphene image, which I found weird, and so I checked the website. I still ask if there was a chance was an unofficial image somewhere, since those things can actually exist
there are unofficial builds around + you can build for yourself i you have a high-end linux desktop
The next best is probably to pick a phone from DivestOS’s list of supported devices, and preferably ones with a re-lockable bootloader
I did check their list just now. I am surprised some one plus devices are there, shame is the old ones only. I will for sure have a closer look to this list and see how it goes.
Custom roms with relocked bootloader only work on pixels by design. You’ll have to live with an unlocked bootloader.
As for easy installs, Murena’s e/os exists with support. But I can’t vouch for their cloud ecosystem. Other than that, maybe an officially supported lineage device. You will lose safetynet on both unless you want to root.
This is what I feared. Either I deal with the shoddiness of the pixels and get mad from time to time but at least is safe, or no relocking. sigh Thanks for the answer though
See this: https://github.com/chenxiaolong/avbroot/issues/299
The issue with the Pixel seems to be a a build-up of static in the LCD.
That could be. And also, this is 2024. Why is this even an issue with something basic as static? Surely is not the first time this problem was dealt with before shipping this stuff out.
I don’t know if you missed it, but the link was to a list of phones that are confirmed to support custom keys.
See this: https://github.com/chenxiaolong/avbroot/issues/299
I never encountered this I have to say. Will bookmark it and save it for later when I need to double check this. But from what I see, FP 4 and 5 can be locked again after custom ROm imaging. This is actually good news. Thanks for the share!
Just my two cents on this topic: I used to use an Android phone with LineageOS (this was before Graphene was a thing), and struggled with similar bugs/issues from time to time.
I got an iPhone and never looked back.
Don’t get me wrong, as you suggested here, iPhones are objectively worse in a lot of ways. But mostly, it. Just. Works. And, rather than fight the OS on things like VPN configs, ad blocking, browser usage, etc, I’ve found that I simply use my phone less, and tether my phone to a real computer more often. Paired with a small chromebook or other laptop running Linux, or (gasp) even MacOS, I just don’t use my phone as much as I used to.
On the plus side, iPhones are supported for a long time, have a secure lockdown mode which you can enable if you’re extra paranoid, and have “don’t need to think about it” full-device encryption including full phone backup support. If your phone ever dies or you want to upgrade, you can load a full backup/image from your old device on to your new one with close to zero fuss (just gotta deal with USB 2.0 speeds on all but the newest phones :)
One final note, you don’t need to sign in to an account to use iOS as far as I’m aware. You lose out on the sync/iCloud stuff that Apple provides, but it sounds like you don’t care much about that anyway.
This is also a good perspective. One thing I was thinking just now: at some point, side loading on iOS will be a thing. I wonder at that time we can truly use an iPhone without an account at all (not even to install stuff), but my guess is, considering their track record, they will do the wildest malicious compliance possible…
Yeah, that’s a good point. I’m not counting on sideloading bringing any benefit to me, but if it does I’ll be pleasantly surprised.
you are on the privacy lemmy, i hope you realize that. iPhones are as anti-privacy as possible
you are on the privacy lemmy, i hope you realize that
Yes.
iPhones are as anti-privacy as possible
I’m not even sure I know what “as anti-privacy as possible” actually means, but this is a garbage statement, and I say this as someone who thinks that both Android and iOS are flaming piles of shit. Did you see that the OP mentioned that they’d consider switching to an iPhone?
Any supported phone with lineage OS? Primacy is really good but not as much security focused as GOS
That was my first thinking. But then again, no relocking makes things a lot harder
Only the pixels phones allow for relocking the bootloader with a custom ROM. Might be possible on a few other devices when jumping true a load of hoops and potentially bricking the device.
Didn’t look iode before. I am not a fan of iode in general (as principle, as an os is probably a good daily driver). From what I see, the phone available from there that I could get would be the fairphone. But the lack of relocking after installing calyx is not exactly amazing
Fairphone 5, Shift6mq, Oneplus 11, Xperia Pro 1, Motorola Edge 40 pro. Avoid ios like wildfire. I use an iPad and it is buggy, expensive, and full of spyware, really bad if you want any privacy (and it doesn’t have custom rom support at all)
Fairphone is an option. Can be relocked. It is not important, what Fairphone supports but if it is supported by custom ROM developers. Fairphone is supported by most. But please avoid using Calyx or iode. They are both outclassed by Divest.
At least for /e/OS I can assure that relocking is simple enough. As there is partnership between Fairphone and Murena (/e/ developers) OTA updates are safe for future. Unfortunately the Fairphone support is horrible and /e/ is always too far behind security patch level.
