• Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The unicyclist on the left is saying the bicyclist is only riding a bike because they don’t have enough skill for a unicycle. The unicyclist on the right is saying they can’t learn to ride a bike because they’ve spent too much of their life riding a unicycle. It’s a dig at people who don’t want to switch to memory-safe languages like rust.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s a dig at people who don’t want to switch to memory-safe languages like rust.

        Now that’s a stretch, it could be anything (no, it couldn’t, although I think this may have application to some other pairs of languages)

        • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          48 minutes ago

          Yeah, Rust is simply the big one right now. It could just as easily apply to people in the 1960’s who didn’t want to adopt structured programming, or a compiler at all.

          • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 minutes ago

            I personally prefer the memory safety tools offered by D over Rust. D also doesn’t come with const by default, and you can even opt out of the RAII stuff a certain graphics driver developer boasted about in the Linux developer mailings (RAII can be a bad for optimization).

            • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 minutes ago

              I feel like this has come up before, and D is not memory safe. It has some helper-type features, but at the end of the day it is still C-like.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I mean, that’s just my interpretation. I don’t think it’s a stretch though, switching to memory safe languages like rust has been pretty big recently.

          How did you interpret the comic?

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 minutes ago

            I should have added a ‘/s’, but I thought it is somewhat obvious, it really reminds of all the ‘git gud at C instead of doing Rust’

      • stingpie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I am both the left guy and right guy. If you can’t program without using a memory safe language, it’s a skill issue. But I also don’t want to switch to rust because I like the challenge of manual memory management. (Also rust’s syntax and semantics looks like it was designed by a monkey attacking a typewriter.)

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          I write C++ professionally. Saying it’s a skill issue doesn’t solve the problem. If a dev with 15+ years of experience still isn’t writing memory-safe C++ (ie. some of the people I work with), they’re not going to learn now.

          And if you’re a project manager and you choose to use C++ because your team says they like the challenge then you should be fired.

          Of course none of this applies to hobby projects…

          • stingpie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            47 minutes ago

            Yeah, I’m not a model for good programing. I don’t program professionally, I just like challenging myself in my hobby projects.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think it would be clearer if we saw the person on the bike pass by and the last panel was just the character laying on the ground