Authors using a new tool to search a list of 183,000 books used to train AI are furious to find their works on the list.

  • sab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Using it to (create a tool to) create derivatives of the work on a massive scale.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      An AI model is not a derivative work. It does not contain the copyrighted expression, just information about the copyrighted expression.

    • SirGolan@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wikipedia: In copyright law, a derivative work is an expressive creation that includes major copyrightable elements of a first, previously created original work.

      I think you may be off a bit on what a derivative work is. I don’t see LLMs spouting out major copyrightable elements of books. They can give a summary sure, but Cliff Notes would like to have a word if you think that’s copyright infringement.

    • lloram239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Better tell that Google and their search index, book scanning project and knowledge graph.

      • sab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Would you be okay with applying that argument for any crime?

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would be, and I don’t understand why you think this would be a problem. I wouldn’t want the government to be preventing activities that there weren’t any actual laws prohibiting.

          • sab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re missing the point. I’ll make your example more specific.

            Well when fraud/rape/murder happens we have laws. So no problems.

            Those things happen. Creating a LLM based on copyrighted material without permission happens - it’s not a hypothetical. But even then, giving a punishment after the fact does not make the initial crime “no problem”, as you put it.