rhabarba@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoOpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseusmarc.infoexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1124arrow-down14
arrow-up1120arrow-down1external-linkOpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseusmarc.inforhabarba@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down3·1 year agoYes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
minus-squarechellomere@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoFor example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoOpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.
Yes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
For example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.