• wirehead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    4 months ago

    A few years ago now I was thinking that it was about time for me to upgrade my desktop (with a case that dates back to 2000 or so, I guess they call them “sleepers” these days?) because some of my usual computer things were taking too long.

    And I realized that Intel was selling the 12th generation of the Core at that point, which means the next one was a 13th generation and I dono, I’m not superstitious but I figured if anything went wrong I’d feel pretty darn silly. So I pulled the trigger and got a 12th gen core processor and motherboard and a few other bits.

    This is quite amusing in retrospect.

    • JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      I recently built myself a computer, and went with AMD’s 3d cache chips and boy am I glad. I think I went 12th Gen for my brothers computer but it was mid range which hasn’t had these issues to my knowledge.

      Also yes, sleeper is the right term.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think I went 12th Gen for my brothers computer

        12th gen isn’t affected. The problem affects only the 13th and 14th gen Intel chips. If your brother has 12th gen – and you might want to confirm that – he’s okay.

        For the high-end thing, initially it was speculated that it was just the high-end chips in these generations, but it’s definitely the case that chips other than just the high-end ones have been recorded failing. It may be that the problem is worse with the high-end CPUs, but it’s known to not be restricted to them at this point.

        The bar they list in the article here is 13th and 14th gen Intel desktop CPUs over 65W TDP.