• Azzu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    You’re taking one thought and extending it to try to interpret all of human society with.

    That’s absolutely not true. I’m saying that status-seeking is a part of almost all of our unconscious decision-making processes, not that it’s the sole part of our decision-making process. A part != Interpret all with it. Of course there’s other parts, like you say, survival.

    I can not convey all my knowledge and thoughts in a single comment. Even though I tried to shorten it, you still find too long. The “it’s only a part” I found obvious, thus I didn’t stretch it, but you would have needed it to be included. You personally didn’t need the other parts that you found too long. It’s basically impossible to know what you need to talk about when explaining something without a conversation, because we don’t know each other’s knowledge base. It’s even more impossible in a forum-style format, where one comment is read by potentially every human on Earth, each of which have vastly different knowledge bases. What is obvious/superfluous for one is not for someone else.

    What you call status seeking can be called survival in some cases, enjoyment in some, and a waste of resources in some.

    Do all these things not play together? Isn’t having status a way to survive better? Aren’t the activities that are enjoyable also the ones that allows us to survive (in a non-modern, ancestral world context in which we evolved)? Isn’t having status enjoyable for most?

    • The Liver@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I feel that you’re 70% on the mark but then why is it a turn-off for you, as you said in your original message?

      • The Liver@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Part of the 30%:

        Status seeking behaviour has many justifications i.e. that it helps smoothen human interaction, to say the least. So why is it a turn-off for you?

        • Azzu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I don’t think it helps “smoothen” interaction at all. Of course it depends on the exact situation, like I already described, if it’s about helping other people or not affecting anyone negatively, it’s completely fine.

          But for one example, an unaware status-seeking behavior I see very often is having an Instagram account and posting pictures of their life, in an attempt to gain followers. This could not affect anyone negatively… but 99% of the time, it is, because they interrupt moments that should be enjoyed by being present within the moment with trying to get the perfect picture to show to other people what amazing moments they are experiencing.

          The “unaware” was as much of a part of the turn-off as the “status-seeking”, maybe even more so. I think if you’re aware of your status-seeking behavior, you’re able to find much better ways to apply it than if you’re unaware of it.

    • The Liver@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s basically impossible to know what you need to talk about when explaining something without a conversation, because we don’t know each other’s knowledge base.

      Okay, but in this case “status” was a basic word while the “it’s only a part” was something deeply specific to this conversation. It’s not fair to compare the two.