• CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I still don’t see what historical data has to do with the fact that Intel is CURRENTLY self-destructing, while AMD’s performance has left it in a position of best performance for the dollar, without continual crashing.

    I don’t find an argument of “well, 5 years ago” very convincing when I’m talking about the current position

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “The last 5 years” includes all the years in that time period

      Intel currently has a market lead

      • CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I am curious how you think “% of CPUs world wide” would change in one month so quickly, especially while the self destruction is so recent…

        Like, you are in an article about how server users are currently finding 50%-100% of intel CPU’s are failing, and saying “well, this historical data says…”

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          AMD has been better the whole Ryzen life-span

          But it’s irrelevant

          I am curious how you think “% of CPUs world wide”

          It was sales in the year, but you’re the one claiming they’re the King. At least now you realize how foolish your statement was