So this video explains how https works. What I don’t get is what if a hacker in the middle pretended to be the server and provided me with the box and the public key. wouldn’t he be able to decrypt the message with his private key? I’m not a tech expert, but just curious and trying to learn.

  • ferret@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I am personally using firefox and referencing my own servers that use their own self-signed TLS certs that I have not bothered to load onto my pc because they aren’t public, but chromium-based browsers aren’t some outlier here

    • zeluko@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Your own servers probably also dont have HSTS enabled, or clicking continue will be disabled (if not overwritten in your browser-config)

      • ferret@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Reading the HSTS spec, it doesn’t work on first connection, and while most people are using websites they access more than once, that notably isn’t all web use.

        • zeluko@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Indeed, not classically, but there are HSTS preload lists you can put your domain into which will be downloaded by supported browsers.
          And via HSTS you can include all your subdomains, which would then force proper TLS connections for those you havent visited before too.

          With the new TLS1.3 version we are getting the HTTPS / “SVCB” Record which not only allows ECH but also indicates to the client similar protection policies like HSTS. (RFC 9460)
          ECH will then make such attacks impossible on TLS-level, assuming DNSSEC is used and client can make an integrity-checked lookup e.g. via DoH/DoT or validating DnsSec themselves.
          The strength of this depends on the security-chain you want to follow of course. You dont need DNSSEC, but then the only integrity-check is between DNS-Service and Client if they use DoH/DoT (which is usually enough to defeat local attackers)