• interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Here is something close to tge cutting edge. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSG3_JvnCkU

    What they are creating is a connectome. A list of all neurons and their connection.

    They are down to 34nm slices.

    I said 2nm because the smallest features are 5nm inside the gap between neurons called synapses.

    Presumably, there are no features enconding information smaller than that in the brain.

    But just the connectome might be enough to replicate a consciousness.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Very interesting! Maybe once we understand the structure, we can recreate what’s behind the structure. Not sure if that’s a good thing, but it certainly is intriguing.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t think we need to understand tge structure. Just create a fidel digital copy and run it according to electrochemical rules we have from physics and I believe a largely intact consciousness will emerge.

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          But wouldn’t understanding the structure assist is rebuilding a mechanical version and, thus, recreating the consciousness into an artificial mechanism (such as a Terminator-esque android)?

          • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            It depends what you mean by “understand”. If we have an intact digital connectome and we execute its circuitry in the right kind of simulator. A consciousness would ptobably emerge out of it. But I wouldn’t call this “understanding”. Trillion neurons and other structures are so complex and interwined, it strains the very idea of “understanding” how it works.

            At least not without major aids to break it down into smaller easier to understand chunks.

            • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s fair. I do make a distinction between understanding how something works and why something works. Making it work the way you describe, to me at least, is understanding enough of how it works to be able to reproduce it, even if we don’t yet understand why it works. Until we understand this science, it’s magic.