- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The legal situation is more complex and nuanced than the headline implies, so the article is worth reading. This adds another ruling to the confusing case history regarding forced biometric unlocking.
Not without a search warrant.
And what if it’s the trunk of his car?
Which better relates to the case in the OP, as the lack of a search warrant was never the question here: