Which one(s) and why?

  • I_poop_from_there@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    For me, AURs main advantage is the huge library of software available. No mess resolving dependencies like when manually building from source and no issues with 3rd party repos breaking each others dependencies like in PPA

    • lordnikon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      yeah I get dependency resolution from apt build-dep in Debian but like what commands do you use to build a package with the AUR. From what I read it’s

      search the AUR website git clone tar xf pag.tar makepkg -csi packagename

      am I missing something or is there an easier way that I am just not seeing?

      i promise I’m not trolling I really want to learn.

      • I_poop_from_there@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        In Manjaro you just run this command, there’s a GU package manager as well, but I’ve never used it. Pamac takes care of downloading / building any required dependencies and the AUR repo includes any required patches for the application run well on Arch / Manjaro.

        pamac build

        I haven’t used Arch in years, but I believe it was something similar.

        The whole system is pretty similar to, (but more refined than) FreeBSDs Ports tree.

        • lordnikon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          but can you search the AUR from the CLI or or do you still need to git clone then pacmac build with the package buildID?

      • Turtle@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not sure why noone has pointed this out but if you use paru or yay instead of pacman, installing/searching the AUR is the same as if they are in the main repo. It does all the building etc for you.

        • lordnikon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          hmm okay thanks I will check those out maybe that is the missing piece.

          so paru is the equivalent to apt-build install

          but unlike Debian the Repo is outside the distribution.

          i think I’m getting it thank you while I have no interest in leaving debian but this will be fun in distrobox.

          • Turtle@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            To be specific…

            Install something from the main repo:

            $ paru -S package

            Install something from the AUR:

            $ paru -S package

            To search for a package, in the main repo or the AUR:

            $ paru -Ss search-term

            With the search results, it clearly labels if something is from the AUR or extras or the main repo, and you can make it show AUR results first or last in the config.

            https://github.com/Morganamilo/paru

            I don’t actually use pacman directly at all, I use paru for everything and it’s seamless.

      • Jean_Lurk_Picard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        For me the benefit of AUR isn’t necessarily the ease of download. It’s the fact that it’s community based and anyone can build a package for any software. I always git clone and then makepkg. I hate using yay because I want to read the PKGBLD myself and check the hash. I’ve found some obscure software via AUR that I wouldn’t be able to easily download on other distros. Further more the AUR website allows comments from the community which encourages bug fixes and/or a dialogue with specific package issues.