• Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Isn’t the opposite?

    Saving in downloads on Android doesn’t need additional storage permissions, so apps will save in the big “trash can” downloads folder

    Instead, who the fuck knows where iOS saved that file, where every app is sandboxed and isolated

    • Heavybell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      The worst is when an android app is clearly an iOS port. E.g Patreon app saves all files under a generic name rather than the one you get when saving the same file from a browser, because I guess on iOS it just goes into your camera reel without a filename anyway. Or how Bluesky app just straight up says “saved to your camera reel” and puts it in your DCIM folder, with no option to specify a different location.

      • aulin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The worst is when an android app is clearly an iOS port.

        This always means there are zero settings. If there’s no way of configuring the app, I find an alternative. There are few things more frustrating than software that assumes one size fits all.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah lol I love how this commenter is mad about apps being sandboxed. There’s a downloads folder in the files app, or apps can have their own virtual filesystems, also accessible within the files app. Stupid iOS and ensuring that apps can’t just write to wherever they want on the filesystem

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          To be fair, you can’t write wherever you want on Android, either. For example, you can’t write to most of the files in /Android unless you use one of the many, many exploits to do so since it’s basically a protected system area.

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s fair, I was more concerned with someone getting mad at increased security like sandboxing is a bad thing

            • Human Penguin@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              He was more mad at the app developers for not putting effort into mzking the android port appropriate for android. And the fact that they don’t bother providing common needed functions for android apps. Like configurable settings.

              Im not an expert on either as I tend to be a linux pc developer.

              But user accounts is the way linux handles a program having its own space. Andriod has def made a choice from the begging not to have, and now to limit. The multi user part of linux. Assigning a user and group account to programs. Works great as a way of limiting programs ability to interfere with files of other programs without su access to allow the approval of only assess to those approved.

              So I agree android makes a bad choice to ignore any extra protection.

    • Funkytom467@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      True, the folder is pretty easy to find and always the same.

      Although the big problem is how quickly that folder can get messy.

      Mine is filled with so much pdf files that i never want to sort, sometimes there’s duplicates because i didn’t want to scroll to find the first one so i downloaded it a second time.