• spudwart@spudwart.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    We really need more browser engines floating around.

    As of now we really only have 3, Webkit, Firefox Gecko, and Chromium Blink.

    Everything is based on these 3. And I know, technically chromium and firefox are both based on webkit, but they’re so far gone from webkit they function as their own engines.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        I doubt that’s what they meant since Safari currently uses WebKit. But yeah, maybe they meant how WebKit is a fork of KHTML and Chrome is a fork of WebKit.

      • excitingburp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 年前

        Ultimately you really only have KHTML (what Webkit was forked from), Gecko, Triton (IE classic), and I can’t recall what the new (now dead) engine in IE11 was called. The rest are forks, mostly of Webkit/KHTML.

        I guess there’s Ladybird and Servo too, but they are a way still from being used as a daily driver.

    • kib48@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      tbh i think it would be better if there was a single collaborative engine instead, owned by a non-profit company like The Linux Foundation

      maybe the W3C could establish their own but idk if they even do anything these days

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      As of now we really only have 3, Webkit, Firefox, and Chromium.

      Webkit is the only browser engine in that list; the other 2 are browsers, not engines. Firefox uses the Gecko engine. Chrome/chromium use Blink engine.