• tymon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s because Threads’ entire userbase is baked into an app that almost everyone already has. It says absolutely nothing about the quality or featureset of the app, much less scalability and actual use.

      • mochi@lemdit.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        From personal use, I can tell you that the featureset is just not there. You can’t even sort by followed accounts only, or get chronological updates. It’s a hot turd sandwich.

  • loz@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All I think of when I see the name, apart from Meta and Zuchbot 3000, is nuclear war and a woman pissing herself. Still undecided as to which is worse.

    • Snow-Foxx@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Zucks poor attempt to connect his Meta bullshit with the fediverse. It’s desired to be a Twitter replacement which uses the ActivityPub-Protocol and therefore is able to communicate with fediverse instances (which use the same protocol). So basically it’s the same as Mastodon, just with Zucks closed source corporate crap.

      • Radioaktvt@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is a way I’m assuming to data mine every user on the fediverse. Safe to say that anyone that connects to the fediverse via Threads will essentially expose all Non Threads user to the Meta data miners?